Urbanization and the Geography of Development
This paper focuses on three interrelated questions on urbanization and the geography of development. First, although we herald cities with their industrial bases as "engines of growth," does industrialization in fact drive urbanization? W...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/05/19540521/urbanization-geography-development http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18747 |
Summary: | This paper focuses on three interrelated
questions on urbanization and the geography of development.
First, although we herald cities with their industrial bases
as "engines of growth," does industrialization in
fact drive urbanization? While such relationships appear in
the data, the process is not straightforward. Among
developing countries, changes in income or industrialization
correlate only weakly with changes in urbanization. This
suggests that policy and institutional factors may also
influence the urbanization process. In fact, the
relationship between industrialization and urbanization is
absent in Sub-Saharan Africa. Second, do development
policies have a big-city bias and, if so, what does this
imply for growth and inequality? Intelligent public
infrastructure investment inevitably involves picking
winners. One hopes that such choices are based on market
indicators, such as where industry is starting to
agglomerate and where there are clear needs. Yet governments
seem to favor the biggest cities which in turn draw firms
and migrants to these cities. To try to avoid excessive
in-migration and oversized, congested cities, favored cities
might adopt policies that make living conditions for
migrants more unpleasant. This can result in increased
inequality and social tension. Finally, the paper examines
city sizes and city-size distributions. Factors determining
both aspects are complex and poorly understood. It is hard
to be proscriptive about either individual city sizes or
overall city-size distributions. The best policies
strengthen institutions in the relevant markets so that
market forces can move the economy toward better outcomes. |
---|