To Share or Not to Share : Does Local Participation Matter for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment?
This paper examines whether the degree of spillovers from foreign direct investment is affected by the foreign ownership share in investment projects. The analysis, based on an unbalanced panel of Romanian firms from 1998-2000, provides evidence co...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/08/2503684/share-or-not-share-local-participation-matter-spillovers-foreign-direct-investment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18136 |
Summary: | This paper examines whether the degree
of spillovers from foreign direct investment is affected by
the foreign ownership share in investment projects. The
analysis, based on an unbalanced panel of Romanian firms
from 1998-2000, provides evidence consistent with positive
intra-sectoral spillovers resulting from fully-owned foreign
affiliates but not from projects with joint domestic and
foreign ownership. This finding is consistent with
literature suggesting that foreign investors tend to put
more resources into technology transfer to their
wholly-owned projects than to those owned partially. The
data also indicate that the presence of partially
foreign-owned projects is correlated with higher
productivity of domestic firms in upstream industries,
suggesting that domestic suppliers benefit from contacts
with multinational customers. But the opposite is true for
fully-owned foreign affiliates, which appear to have a
negative effect on domestic firms in upstream industries.
These results are consistent with the observation that
foreign investors entering a host country through greenfield
projects are less likely to source locally than those
engaged in joint ventures or partial acquisitions. They are
also in line with the evidence suggesting that fully-owned
foreign subsidiaries use newer or more sophisticated
technologies than jointly-owned investment projects, and
thus may have higher requirements which only a few, if any,
domestic suppliers are able to meet. |
---|