Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia

The authors evaluate the effect of various community level infrastructure rehabilitation projects undertaken in rural Georgia on household well-being. Their analysis is based on combining household and community level survey data. The authors'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lokshin, Michael, Yemtsov, Ruslan
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2778676/evaluating-impact-infrastructure-rehabilitation-projects-household-welfare-rural-georgia
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18048
id okr-10986-18048
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-180482021-04-23T14:03:41Z Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia Lokshin, Michael Yemtsov, Ruslan ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS BENEFICIARIES CLINICS COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONTROL GROUPS COUNTERFACTUAL DISTRICTS ECONOMICS EMPLOYMENT EXPENDITURES EXTREME POVERTY HEALTH STATUS HOUSEHOLDS IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION IMPACT INDICATORS INCOME INCOME INEQUALITY INFANT MORTALITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS INTERVENTION LIVELIHOOD LIVING STANDARDS MANAGERS MARKETING MORTALITY OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUT INDICATORS PARENTS POLICY RESEARCH POVERTY ALLEVIATION POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS POVERTY REDUCTION PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT OBJECTIVES PUPILS ROADS RURAL AREAS RURAL POPULATION SANITATION SCHOOLS SECONDARY SCHOOLS SELECTION BIAS SOCIAL SERVICES TARGETING TREATMENT GROUPS URBAN AREAS VILLAGES WATER SUPPLY WORKERS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IMPACT EVALUATION HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDICATORS RURAL CONDITIONS COMMUNITY BASED DISTRIBUTION HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS WELFARE ECONOMICS SECTORAL ALLOCATION WORKERS The authors evaluate the effect of various community level infrastructure rehabilitation projects undertaken in rural Georgia on household well-being. Their analysis is based on combining household and community level survey data. The authors' empirical approach uses the panel structure of the data to control for time-invariant un-observables at the community level by applying propensity-score-matched double difference comparison. The results indicate that improvements in school and road infrastructure produce nontrivial welfare gains for the poor at the village and country levels. The impact of water rehabilitation projects is ambiguous. School rehabilitation projects produce the largest gains for the poor. The methodological lesson from this analysis is that ad hoc community surveys matched with ongoing nationally representative surveys can provide a feasible and low cost impact evaluation tool. 2014-04-25T16:00:23Z 2014-04-25T16:00:23Z 2003-10 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2778676/evaluating-impact-infrastructure-rehabilitation-projects-household-welfare-rural-georgia http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18048 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 3155 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research Europe and Central Asia Georgia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS
BENEFICIARIES
CLINICS
COMMUNITIES
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE
CONTROL GROUPS
COUNTERFACTUAL
DISTRICTS
ECONOMICS
EMPLOYMENT
EXPENDITURES
EXTREME POVERTY
HEALTH STATUS
HOUSEHOLDS
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
INCOME
INCOME INEQUALITY
INFANT MORTALITY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
INTERVENTION
LIVELIHOOD
LIVING STANDARDS
MANAGERS
MARKETING
MORTALITY
OUTCOME INDICATORS
OUTPUT INDICATORS
PARENTS
POLICY RESEARCH
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY REDUCTION
PROJECT EVALUATION
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
PUPILS
ROADS
RURAL AREAS
RURAL POPULATION
SANITATION
SCHOOLS
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
SELECTION BIAS
SOCIAL SERVICES
TARGETING
TREATMENT GROUPS
URBAN AREAS
VILLAGES
WATER SUPPLY
WORKERS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
IMPACT EVALUATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDICATORS
RURAL CONDITIONS
COMMUNITY BASED DISTRIBUTION
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
WELFARE ECONOMICS
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
WORKERS
spellingShingle ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS
BENEFICIARIES
CLINICS
COMMUNITIES
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE
CONTROL GROUPS
COUNTERFACTUAL
DISTRICTS
ECONOMICS
EMPLOYMENT
EXPENDITURES
EXTREME POVERTY
HEALTH STATUS
HOUSEHOLDS
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
INCOME
INCOME INEQUALITY
INFANT MORTALITY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
INTERVENTION
LIVELIHOOD
LIVING STANDARDS
MANAGERS
MARKETING
MORTALITY
OUTCOME INDICATORS
OUTPUT INDICATORS
PARENTS
POLICY RESEARCH
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY REDUCTION
PROJECT EVALUATION
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
PUPILS
ROADS
RURAL AREAS
RURAL POPULATION
SANITATION
SCHOOLS
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
SELECTION BIAS
SOCIAL SERVICES
TARGETING
TREATMENT GROUPS
URBAN AREAS
VILLAGES
WATER SUPPLY
WORKERS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
IMPACT EVALUATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDICATORS
RURAL CONDITIONS
COMMUNITY BASED DISTRIBUTION
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
WELFARE ECONOMICS
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
WORKERS
Lokshin, Michael
Yemtsov, Ruslan
Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
geographic_facet Europe and Central Asia
Georgia
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 3155
description The authors evaluate the effect of various community level infrastructure rehabilitation projects undertaken in rural Georgia on household well-being. Their analysis is based on combining household and community level survey data. The authors' empirical approach uses the panel structure of the data to control for time-invariant un-observables at the community level by applying propensity-score-matched double difference comparison. The results indicate that improvements in school and road infrastructure produce nontrivial welfare gains for the poor at the village and country levels. The impact of water rehabilitation projects is ambiguous. School rehabilitation projects produce the largest gains for the poor. The methodological lesson from this analysis is that ad hoc community surveys matched with ongoing nationally representative surveys can provide a feasible and low cost impact evaluation tool.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Lokshin, Michael
Yemtsov, Ruslan
author_facet Lokshin, Michael
Yemtsov, Ruslan
author_sort Lokshin, Michael
title Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
title_short Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
title_full Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
title_fullStr Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Impact of Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects on Household Welfare in Rural Georgia
title_sort evaluating the impact of infrastructure rehabilitation projects on household welfare in rural georgia
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2014
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2778676/evaluating-impact-infrastructure-rehabilitation-projects-household-welfare-rural-georgia
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18048
_version_ 1764438758917144576