Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf

World Bank economists are mostly practical people, people who try to answer the question, 'what exactly should this particular country do right now?' But if they had hoped that the growth regression lessons summarized in William Brock and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pritchett, Lant
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC: World Bank 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/05/17737235/comment-growth-empirics-reality-william-brock-steven-n-durlauf
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17446
id okr-10986-17446
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-174462021-04-23T14:03:29Z Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf Pritchett, Lant ADVANCED COUNTRIES ECONOMIC REVIEW EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION EMPIRICAL GROWTH LITERATURE EMPIRICAL RESEARCH EMPIRICAL WORK ESSAYS GROWTH EMPIRICS GROWTH REGRESSION GROWTH REGRESSIONS POLICY CHANGE POLICY CHANGES POLICY DECISIONS POLICY DISCUSSIONS POLICY REFORM POLICY VARIABLES TFP TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY TRADE POLICY World Bank economists are mostly practical people, people who try to answer the question, 'what exactly should this particular country do right now?' But if they had hoped that the growth regression lessons summarized in William Brock and Steven Durlauf's article would enhance their practical advice giving, they might feel some dissatisfaction. How would they change their advice to, say, Brazil? But that is why this article is important conceptually. It goes to the heart of the matter by proposing a change in the empirical growth literature's fundamental methodology, from model testing to decision theoretic. The article's valiant but flawed attempt reveals the difficulties in making this shift, however. The reader likes to make three points: there is a tension between the interests of academics and practitioners in growth regressions; output response heterogeneity is a huge practical problem; and policy decisions can be guided only in broad outlines by growth regressions. 2014-03-27T21:29:43Z 2014-03-27T21:29:43Z 2001-05 Journal Article http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/05/17737235/comment-growth-empirics-reality-william-brock-steven-n-durlauf World Bank Economic Review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17446 English en_US CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Washington, DC: World Bank Publications & Research :: Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ADVANCED COUNTRIES
ECONOMIC REVIEW
EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION
EMPIRICAL GROWTH LITERATURE
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
EMPIRICAL WORK
ESSAYS
GROWTH EMPIRICS
GROWTH REGRESSION
GROWTH REGRESSIONS
POLICY CHANGE
POLICY CHANGES
POLICY DECISIONS
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
POLICY REFORM
POLICY VARIABLES
TFP
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
TRADE POLICY
spellingShingle ADVANCED COUNTRIES
ECONOMIC REVIEW
EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION
EMPIRICAL GROWTH LITERATURE
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
EMPIRICAL WORK
ESSAYS
GROWTH EMPIRICS
GROWTH REGRESSION
GROWTH REGRESSIONS
POLICY CHANGE
POLICY CHANGES
POLICY DECISIONS
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
POLICY REFORM
POLICY VARIABLES
TFP
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
TRADE POLICY
Pritchett, Lant
Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
description World Bank economists are mostly practical people, people who try to answer the question, 'what exactly should this particular country do right now?' But if they had hoped that the growth regression lessons summarized in William Brock and Steven Durlauf's article would enhance their practical advice giving, they might feel some dissatisfaction. How would they change their advice to, say, Brazil? But that is why this article is important conceptually. It goes to the heart of the matter by proposing a change in the empirical growth literature's fundamental methodology, from model testing to decision theoretic. The article's valiant but flawed attempt reveals the difficulties in making this shift, however. The reader likes to make three points: there is a tension between the interests of academics and practitioners in growth regressions; output response heterogeneity is a huge practical problem; and policy decisions can be guided only in broad outlines by growth regressions.
format Journal Article
author Pritchett, Lant
author_facet Pritchett, Lant
author_sort Pritchett, Lant
title Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
title_short Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
title_full Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
title_fullStr Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
title_full_unstemmed Comment on 'Growth Empirics and Reality,' by William A. Brock and Steven N. Durlauf
title_sort comment on 'growth empirics and reality,' by william a. brock and steven n. durlauf
publisher Washington, DC: World Bank
publishDate 2014
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/05/17737235/comment-growth-empirics-reality-william-brock-steven-n-durlauf
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17446
_version_ 1764433171199295488