Economic Regulation of Urban Water and Sanitation Services : Some Practical Lessons
This paper discusses the regulation of water and sanitation services in urban areas. Specifically, it explores ways of thinking about regulatory design as part of a wider, country-specific program to reform the way in which water supply and sanitat...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/04/7680938/economic-regulation-urban-water-sanitation-services-some-practical-lessons http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17239 |
Summary: | This paper discusses the regulation of
water and sanitation services in urban areas. Specifically,
it explores ways of thinking about regulatory design as part
of a wider, country-specific program to reform the way in
which water supply and sanitation services are provided and
paid for. In the past, regulatory advisers often focused on
the need to introduce international best practice- generally
in the form of an independent regulatory organization-to
solve a wide range of performance problems. However, this
approach was seldom straightforward, nor was it always
successful. There is no one-size-fits-all regulatory design
that can be reliably applied to resolve performance
problems. Rather, regulation is best developed on a
country-by-country basis through answering questions such as
the following: a) What are the real sector problems, and
which of these can regulation solve? b) What specific
objectives is regulation aiming to achieve? c) What
combination of organizations and instruments is most
suitable and would work best for achieving these regulatory
objectives? This paper is not intended to be a detailed
guide for regulatory design. Rather, it discusses how to
approach regulatory design. This approach encourages
decision makers and their advisors to apply sound principles
within country-specific settings, rather than advocate
best-practice models without a thorough analysis of whether
these are suitable for the country's context. The best
combination of rules and institutions for setting tariffs
and service standards3,-and indeed, the best reform options
in general-will vary from country to country. Regulatory
designers should select this combination by first focusing
on the principal sector objectives and working with
institutions that may already be responsible for achieving them. |
---|