Quality of Government and Living Standards
It is generally acknowledged that a government's output is difficult to define and its value is hard to measure. The practical solution adopted by national accounts systems is to equate output value to input costs, but well-documented ineffici...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Brief |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/09/16750755/quality-government-living-standards http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17093 |
id |
okr-10986-17093 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-170932021-04-23T14:03:33Z Quality of Government and Living Standards Grigoli, Francesco Ley, Eduardo ABSENTEEISM ACCOUNTING COL CONSUMERS COUNTRY COMPARISONS DEBT DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ECONOMIC RESEARCH EXCHANGE RATES FISCAL POLICY GDP GDP PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HEALTH CARE HEALTH SPENDING HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INCOME GROUPS INEFFICIENCY INEQUALITY INFLATION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LIVING STANDARDS NATIONAL INCOME NET INCOME OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTPUTS POSITIVE EFFECTS POVERTY REDUCTION PRODUCTION FUNCTION PRODUCTIVITY PUBLIC PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR EFFICIENCY PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF LIFE VALUE ADDED WASTE WEALTH WORKERS It is generally acknowledged that a government's output is difficult to define and its value is hard to measure. The practical solution adopted by national accounts systems is to equate output value to input costs, but well-documented inefficiencies in government activities make this approximation questionable. One solution is to purge from gross domestic product (GDP) the fraction of government inputs that is wasted. This note illustrates such a correction, computing corrected per capita GDP on the basis of two studies that estimate efficiency scores for several dimensions of government activities. Results show that the correction could be significant and reorder the rankings of living standards. 2014-02-18T22:43:23Z 2014-02-18T22:43:23Z 2012-09 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/09/16750755/quality-government-living-standards http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17093 English en_US Economic premise;no. 89 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
ABSENTEEISM ACCOUNTING COL CONSUMERS COUNTRY COMPARISONS DEBT DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ECONOMIC RESEARCH EXCHANGE RATES FISCAL POLICY GDP GDP PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HEALTH CARE HEALTH SPENDING HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INCOME GROUPS INEFFICIENCY INEQUALITY INFLATION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LIVING STANDARDS NATIONAL INCOME NET INCOME OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTPUTS POSITIVE EFFECTS POVERTY REDUCTION PRODUCTION FUNCTION PRODUCTIVITY PUBLIC PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR EFFICIENCY PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF LIFE VALUE ADDED WASTE WEALTH WORKERS |
spellingShingle |
ABSENTEEISM ACCOUNTING COL CONSUMERS COUNTRY COMPARISONS DEBT DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ECONOMIC RESEARCH EXCHANGE RATES FISCAL POLICY GDP GDP PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HEALTH CARE HEALTH SPENDING HUMAN CAPITAL INCOME INCOME GROUPS INEFFICIENCY INEQUALITY INFLATION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LIVING STANDARDS NATIONAL INCOME NET INCOME OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTPUTS POSITIVE EFFECTS POVERTY REDUCTION PRODUCTION FUNCTION PRODUCTIVITY PUBLIC PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR EFFICIENCY PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF LIFE VALUE ADDED WASTE WEALTH WORKERS Grigoli, Francesco Ley, Eduardo Quality of Government and Living Standards |
relation |
Economic premise;no. 89 |
description |
It is generally acknowledged that a
government's output is difficult to define and its
value is hard to measure. The practical solution adopted by
national accounts systems is to equate output value to input
costs, but well-documented inefficiencies in government
activities make this approximation questionable. One
solution is to purge from gross domestic product (GDP) the
fraction of government inputs that is wasted. This note
illustrates such a correction, computing corrected per
capita GDP on the basis of two studies that estimate
efficiency scores for several dimensions of government
activities. Results show that the correction could be
significant and reorder the rankings of living standards. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Brief |
author |
Grigoli, Francesco Ley, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Grigoli, Francesco Ley, Eduardo |
author_sort |
Grigoli, Francesco |
title |
Quality of Government and Living Standards |
title_short |
Quality of Government and Living Standards |
title_full |
Quality of Government and Living Standards |
title_fullStr |
Quality of Government and Living Standards |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of Government and Living Standards |
title_sort |
quality of government and living standards |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/09/16750755/quality-government-living-standards http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17093 |
_version_ |
1764435143809826816 |