Eligibility Thresholds for Minimum Living Guarantee Programs : International Practices and Implications for China
Using a simple framework, this paper discusses the underlying reason of the variation of threshold level in developed countries, from the least generous 20 percent to around 60 percent of median wage, with an average of 35 percent. The generosity o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/11/18600397/eligibility-thresholds-minimum-living-guarantee-programs-international-practices-implications-china http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17006 |
Summary: | Using a simple framework, this paper
discusses the underlying reason of the variation of
threshold level in developed countries, from the least
generous 20 percent to around 60 percent of median wage,
with an average of 35 percent. The generosity of minimum
guarantee social assistance programs is deeply rooted in
social values and principles that further underpin the
policy objectives. Many Organizations for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries set their
policy targets for minimum living standard programs beyond
basic needs and aim to guarantee a minimum socially
acceptable level for a decent living. Thresholds are also
refined to reflect the differences in family size and
demographic structure, difference in regional cost of living
and changes in prices and local wages. In some countries the
thresholds show some regional variation due to local
discretionary powers of sub-national authorities to set the
threshold depending on the co-financing mechanisms. These
lessons are valuable for China as the Chinese government has
made efforts to standardize the implementation and
management of its own minimum income guarantee (Di Bao)
programs. The policy recommendations for China include
accelerating the convergence of localized approaches,
raising the administrative level for setting thresholds to
higher level, defining the roles of central and local
governments in financing and management, and establishing a
transparent budgetary management system to transfer and
allocate social assistance funds. |
---|