The World Bank Group and the Global Food Crisis : An Evaluation of the World Bank Group Response
The unanticipated spike in international food prices in 2007-08 hit many developing countries hard. The World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and International Development Association) organized rapidly for short-term su...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Publications & Research |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank Group
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/17900344/world-bank-group-global-food-crisis-evaluation-world-bank-group-response http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16505 |
Summary: | The unanticipated spike in international
food prices in 2007-08 hit many developing countries hard.
The World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development and International Development Association)
organized rapidly for short-term support in the crisis,
launching a fast-track program of loans and grants, the
Global Food Crisis Response Program (GFRP). The GFRP mainly
targeted low-income countries, and provided detailed policy
advice to governments and its own staff on how to respond to
the crisis. The Bank also scaled up lending for agriculture
and social protection to support the building of medium-term
resilience to future food price shocks. The International
Finance Corporation (IFC) responded by sharply increasing
access to liquidity for agribusinesses and agricultural
traders in the short and medium term, as well as new
programs to improve incentives for agricultural market
participants. This evaluation assesses the effectiveness of
the World Bank Group (WBG) response in addressing the
short-term impacts of the food price crisis and in enhancing
the resilience of countries to future shocks. Bank group
support for the short-term response reached vulnerable
countries, though it is less clear whether it reached the
most vulnerable people within countries. The program
supported 35 countries, with Sub-Saharan Africa accounting
for about 60 percent of funding. The majority of support
went to four countries-Bangladesh, Ethiopia, the
Philippines, and Tanzania. The speed of the response often
had costs for quality, and design deficiencies could not
always be rectified quickly during implementation. The
Bank's short-term assistance to agriculture took the
form of input subsidy and distribution operations to
increase food supply. Short-term support for social safety
nets mainly consisted of in-kind transfers and public works
programs. The Bank's medium-term response for
agriculture significantly increased lending and focused on
expanding productive capacity and resilience. |
---|