CPIA Africa, June 2013 : Assessing Africa's Policies and Institutions
This report is the second in a series of annual reports describing the progress African countries are making on strengthening the quality of policies and institutions that underpin development. It presents Country Policy and Institutional Assessmen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/17924678/africa-country-policy-institutional-assessment-cpia-assessing-africas-policies-institutions http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16504 |
Summary: | This report is the second in a series of
annual reports describing the progress African countries are
making on strengthening the quality of policies and
institutions that underpin development. It presents Country
Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) scores for the 39
African countries that are eligible for support from the
International Development Association (IDA). The development
literature identifies the components of the CPIA as being
broadly relevant for sustaining growth and reducing poverty.
The data provide some support for this association. All
country groups exhibit similar patterns across the four CPIA
clusters. The gap in scores between the macroeconomic
management cluster and the governance cluster is just as
pronounced for fragile as for non-fragile states. In
contrast, the gap between the economic management cluster
and the social policies and structural policies clusters is
small. Overall, the macroeconomic policy stance in
Sub-Saharan Africa was supportive of growth, with monetary
policy focused on managing inflation and fiscal policy
focused on pro-poor spending and infrastructure development.
Inflation declined in 2012, thanks to a moderation in food
and fuel prices and prudent monetary policy. However, an
expansive fiscal policy translated into a weakening of
fiscal balances. Debt levels also edged up, although they
remained moderate. As the policy areas in this cluster are
closely related, there tends to be co-movement in the scores
for monetary and fiscal policy. |
---|