Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization?
Most economic analyses of climate change have focused on the aggregate impact on countries of mitigation actions. We depart first in disaggregating the impact by sector, focusing particularly on manufacturing output and exports. Second, we decompose the impact of a modest agreement on emissions redu...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16353 |
id |
okr-10986-16353 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-163532021-04-23T14:03:28Z Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? Mattoo, Aaditya Subramanian, Arvind van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique He, Jianwu carbon carbon intensity carbon price carbon-intensive manufacturing Carbonization climate climate change climate change mitigation Coal Crude oil emission emission cuts emissions emissions quotas emissions reductions emissions targets Forestry international emissions pp tradable emissions Most economic analyses of climate change have focused on the aggregate impact on countries of mitigation actions. We depart first in disaggregating the impact by sector, focusing particularly on manufacturing output and exports. Second, we decompose the impact of a modest agreement on emissions reductions—17 percent relative to 2005 levels by 2020 for industrial countries and 17 percent relative to business-as-usual for developing countries—into three components: the change in the price of carbon due to each country's emission cuts per se; the further change in this price due to emissions tradability; and the changes due to any international transfers (private and public). Manufacturing output and exports in low carbon intensity countries such as Brazil are less affected. In contrast, in high carbon intensity countries, such as China and India, even a modest agreement depresses manufacturing output by 3–3.5 percent and manufacturing exports by 5.5–7 percent. The increase in the carbon price induced by emissions tradability hurts manufacturing output most while the real exchange rate effects of transfers hurt exports most. 2013-12-04T18:02:31Z 2013-12-04T18:02:31Z 2012-06-01 Journal Article World Bank Economic Review 1564-698X http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16353 en_US CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank Journal Article Brazil China India |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
en_US |
topic |
carbon carbon intensity carbon price carbon-intensive manufacturing Carbonization climate climate change climate change mitigation Coal Crude oil emission emission cuts emissions emissions quotas emissions reductions emissions targets Forestry international emissions pp tradable emissions |
spellingShingle |
carbon carbon intensity carbon price carbon-intensive manufacturing Carbonization climate climate change climate change mitigation Coal Crude oil emission emission cuts emissions emissions quotas emissions reductions emissions targets Forestry international emissions pp tradable emissions Mattoo, Aaditya Subramanian, Arvind van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique He, Jianwu Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
geographic_facet |
Brazil China India |
description |
Most economic analyses of climate change have focused on the aggregate impact on countries of mitigation actions. We depart first in disaggregating the impact by sector, focusing particularly on manufacturing output and exports. Second, we decompose the impact of a modest agreement on emissions reductions—17 percent relative to 2005 levels by 2020 for industrial countries and 17 percent relative to business-as-usual for developing countries—into three components: the change in the price of carbon due to each country's emission cuts per se; the further change in this price due to emissions tradability; and the changes due to any international transfers (private and public). Manufacturing output and exports in low carbon intensity countries such as Brazil are less affected. In contrast, in high carbon intensity countries, such as China and India, even a modest agreement depresses manufacturing output by 3–3.5 percent and manufacturing exports by 5.5–7 percent. The increase in the carbon price induced by emissions tradability hurts manufacturing output most while the real exchange rate effects of transfers hurt exports most. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Mattoo, Aaditya Subramanian, Arvind van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique He, Jianwu |
author_facet |
Mattoo, Aaditya Subramanian, Arvind van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique He, Jianwu |
author_sort |
Mattoo, Aaditya |
title |
Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
title_short |
Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
title_full |
Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
title_fullStr |
Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization? |
title_sort |
can global de-carbonization inhibit developing country industrialization? |
publisher |
Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16353 |
_version_ |
1764432944618799104 |