Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?

Can project evaluation methods be used to evaluate programs: complex interventions involving multiple activities? A program evaluation cannot be based simply on separate evaluations of its components if interactions between the activities are impor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elbers, Chris, Gunning, Jan Willem
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18192682/evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions-evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16038
id okr-10986-16038
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-160382021-04-23T14:03:27Z Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions? Elbers, Chris Gunning, Jan Willem BENEFICIARIES CALCULATION CAPACITY BUILDING CONTROL GROUPS CORRELATIONS COVARIANCE ESTIMATORS EVALUATION METHODS EX POST EVALUATION EXPERIMENTAL DATA EXPERIMENTAL METHODS EXPERIMENTS HEALTH OUTCOMES IMPACT EVALUATION INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INTERVENTION LEARNING LIVING STANDARDS MATRIX NGO NUTRITIONAL STATUS POLICY CHANGES PRECISION PROBABILITY PROGRAM EFFECTS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS PROGRAMS PROJECT EVALUATION RANDOMIZATION RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS REGRESSION ANALYSIS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS SAMPLING ERRORS STANDARD ERRORS STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TARGETING TECHNIQUES TREATMENT EFFECTS VALIDITY treatment heterogeneity sector-wide programs aid effectiveness program evaluation policy evaluation Can project evaluation methods be used to evaluate programs: complex interventions involving multiple activities? A program evaluation cannot be based simply on separate evaluations of its components if interactions between the activities are important. In this paper a measure is proposed, the total program effect (TPE), which is an extension of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET). It explicitly takes into account that in the real world (with heterogeneous treatment effects) individual treatment effects and program assignment are often correlated. The TPE can also deal with the common situation in which such a correlation is the result of decisions on (intended) program participation not being taken centrally. In this context RCTs are less suitable even for the simplest interventions. The TPE can be estimated by applying regression techniques to observational data from a representative sample from the targeted population. The approach is illustrated with an evaluation of a health insurance program in Vietnam. 2013-10-02T21:25:40Z 2013-10-02T21:25:40Z 2013-09 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18192682/evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions-evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16038 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6587 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research East Asia and Pacific Vietnam
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic BENEFICIARIES
CALCULATION
CAPACITY BUILDING
CONTROL GROUPS
CORRELATIONS
COVARIANCE
ESTIMATORS
EVALUATION METHODS
EX POST EVALUATION
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
EXPERIMENTS
HEALTH OUTCOMES
IMPACT EVALUATION
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INTERVENTION
LEARNING
LIVING STANDARDS
MATRIX
NGO
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
POLICY CHANGES
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAM EFFECTS
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS
PROGRAMS
PROJECT EVALUATION
RANDOMIZATION
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
SAMPLING ERRORS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
TARGETING
TECHNIQUES
TREATMENT EFFECTS
VALIDITY
treatment heterogeneity
sector-wide programs
aid effectiveness
program evaluation
policy evaluation
spellingShingle BENEFICIARIES
CALCULATION
CAPACITY BUILDING
CONTROL GROUPS
CORRELATIONS
COVARIANCE
ESTIMATORS
EVALUATION METHODS
EX POST EVALUATION
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
EXPERIMENTS
HEALTH OUTCOMES
IMPACT EVALUATION
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INTERVENTION
LEARNING
LIVING STANDARDS
MATRIX
NGO
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
POLICY CHANGES
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAM EFFECTS
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS
PROGRAMS
PROJECT EVALUATION
RANDOMIZATION
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
SAMPLING ERRORS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
TARGETING
TECHNIQUES
TREATMENT EFFECTS
VALIDITY
treatment heterogeneity
sector-wide programs
aid effectiveness
program evaluation
policy evaluation
Elbers, Chris
Gunning, Jan Willem
Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
geographic_facet East Asia and Pacific
Vietnam
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6587
description Can project evaluation methods be used to evaluate programs: complex interventions involving multiple activities? A program evaluation cannot be based simply on separate evaluations of its components if interactions between the activities are important. In this paper a measure is proposed, the total program effect (TPE), which is an extension of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET). It explicitly takes into account that in the real world (with heterogeneous treatment effects) individual treatment effects and program assignment are often correlated. The TPE can also deal with the common situation in which such a correlation is the result of decisions on (intended) program participation not being taken centrally. In this context RCTs are less suitable even for the simplest interventions. The TPE can be estimated by applying regression techniques to observational data from a representative sample from the targeted population. The approach is illustrated with an evaluation of a health insurance program in Vietnam.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Elbers, Chris
Gunning, Jan Willem
author_facet Elbers, Chris
Gunning, Jan Willem
author_sort Elbers, Chris
title Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
title_short Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
title_full Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
title_fullStr Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Development Programs : Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?
title_sort evaluation of development programs : randomized controlled trials or regressions?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2013
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18192682/evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions-evaluation-development-programs-randomized-controlled-trials-or-regressions
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16038
_version_ 1764432050996117504