Russian Volatility : Obstacle to Firm Survival and Diversification
The need for economic diversification receives a great deal of attention in Russia. This paper looks at a way to improve it that is essential but largely ignored: how to help diversifying firms better survive economic cycles. By definition, economi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/09/18263884/russian-volatility-obstacle-firm-survival-diversification http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15828 |
Summary: | The need for economic diversification
receives a great deal of attention in Russia. This paper
looks at a way to improve it that is essential but largely
ignored: how to help diversifying firms better survive
economic cycles. By definition, economic diversification
means doing new things in new sectors and/or in new markets.
The fate of emerging firms, therefore, should be of great
concern to policy makers. This paper indicates that the ups
and downs -- the volatility -- of Russian economic growth
are key to that fate. Volatility of growth is higher in
Russia than in comparable economies because its slumps are
both longer and deeper. They go beyond the cleansing effects
of eliminating the least efficient firms; relatively
efficient ones get swept away as well. In fact, an
incumbency advantage improves a firm's chances of
weathering the ups and downs of the economy, regardless of a
firm's relative efficiency. Finally, firms in sectors
where competition is less intense are less likely to exit
the market, regardless of their relative efficiency. Two
policy conclusions emerge from these findings -- one
macroeconomic and one microeconomic. First, the importance
of countercyclical policies is heightened to include
efficiency elements. Second, strengthening competition and
other factors that support the survival of new, emerging and
efficient firms will promote economic diversification.
Efforts to help small and medium enterprises may be better
spent on removing the obstacles that young, infant firms
face as they attempt to enter, survive and grow. |
---|