Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Republic of Lithuania
This assessment benchmarks the Lithuanian corporate governance system against the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and highlights a number of areas where Lithuania's corporate governance system can be strengthened. Lithuania has already...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/07/6568353/report-observance-standards-codes-rosc-lithuania-corporate-governance-country-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15305 |
Summary: | This assessment benchmarks the
Lithuanian corporate governance system against the OECD
Principles of Corporate Governance and highlights a number
of areas where Lithuania's corporate governance system
can be strengthened. Lithuania has already invested
considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet
EU Directives, and the legislative and regulatory framework
dealing with corporate governance issues is quite robust.
The policy recommendations can be grouped under three broad
categories: legislative reform, institutional strengthening
and voluntary/private initiatives. The legislative and
regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance
practices has undergone substantial change. The most serious
problem is compliance and enforcement. While the assessment
highlights several areas where Lithuania's corporate
governance system could be strengthened, the priority should
be given to the enforcement of existing laws. This report
promotes private sector initiatives and capacity building to
follow up on the legislative progress on corporate
governance reform. It recommends the development of a
Lithuanian or regional voluntary code of best practice in
corporate governance. The code should be prepared by a task
force coordinated by the LSE and made up of public and
private sector representatives. In addition, the report
proposes the creation of a regional Institute of Directors,
to provide training for supervisory board members,
disseminate best practice and play a vital role in the
dialogue between the public and private sector. Together,
these measures give issuers the choice to implement best
practice and investors a benchmark against which to measure
corporate governance in Lithuania. |
---|