International Public Administration Reform : Implications for the Russian Federation
This paper has four objectives: 1. To offer an analysis of public administration reform experiences in a set of countries chosen to illustrate the range and depth of recent administrative change. 2. To pick out from this analysis those variables th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Publication |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/11/2854009/international-public-administration-reform-implications-russian-federation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15068 |
Summary: | This paper has four objectives: 1. To
offer an analysis of public administration reform
experiences in a set of countries chosen to illustrate the
range and depth of recent administrative change. 2. To pick
out from this analysis those variables that seem
particularly relevant to the current condition in the
Russian Federation. 3. To suggest a way of organizing
thinking about a very complex and contested field. 4. To
provide some pointers toward a reform strategy for
policymakers in this area in the Russian Federation.
Identifying the key country comparators and the relevant
variables and offering a way of thinking about their
significance are particularly important for the Russian
Federation authorities as they prepare for implementation of
the Program for the Reform of the Civil Service System in
the Russian Federation. As reforms intensify, there will be
a flood of serious, experienced international advisers and
management experts, but there will also be those with
"snake oil" to sell. Reformers need some lenses
through which they can critically examine reform proposals
and evaluate advice from experts. The paper draws its
conclusions from an analysis of 14 countries selected by
representatives of the Russian Federation government:
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Finland, Germany,
Hungary, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, the Republic
of Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The
World Bank was asked to look at a number of countries that
faced similar challenges to those facing Russia in this
area, while also looking at some countries that faced
different problems but achieved interesting results. |
---|