Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development
Given steady progress in the development of democracy - establishment of effective checks on arbitrary rulers, replacement of arbitrary rules with just and honest ones, and, participation of ordinary people in the making of rules - Indonesia could...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Other Public Sector Study |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/11/2803689/indonesia-combating-corruption-indonesia-enhancing-accountability-development http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14652 |
| id |
okr-10986-14652 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION IN POLITICS DEMOCRATIZATION FINANCIAL CRISES POLITICAL FACTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING PUBLIC EXPENDITURES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCUREMENT FISCAL ADMINISTRATION FORESTRY ECONOMICS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT JUDICIAL PROCESS CIVIL SERVICE BUDGET PROCESS LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BANKING SYSTEMS ELECTRIC POWER FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT COURT PROCEDURES DONOR FINANCE ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ANTI-CORRUPTION AUDITING AUTHORITY BENEFICIARIES BRIBES BUDGET CYCLE CITIZEN CITIZENS CIVIL SERVANTS CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY CLEAN GOVERNMENT COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINTS CONSULTATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION CORRUPTION LEVELS COURT SYSTEM DECENTRALIZATION DECREES DEMOCRACY DISCLOSURE DISTRICTS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC ELITES ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMIC REFORMS ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES FIGHTING CORRUPTION FIGURES FINANCIAL CRISIS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FOREIGN INVESTORS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE ISSUES GOVERNANCE REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS INCOME INCOME LEVELS INTEGRITY INVESTIGATIONS JUSTICE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY LAWS LEGAL ACTION LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL SYSTEM LEGISLATION LEGITIMACY LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL POLITICIANS MEDIA NATIONS NATURAL RESOURCES OPENNESS PARLIAMENT PARTICIPATORY BUDGET PENALTIES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PETTY CORRUPTION POLICY CREDIBILITY POLICY IMPLICATIONS POLITICAL COMPETITION POLITICAL ECONOMY POLITICAL ELITE POLITICAL FORCES POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL MANAGEMENT POLITICAL PARTIES POLITICAL PARTY POLITICAL SURVIVAL POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRESIDENCY PRIORITIES PROJECT DESIGN PROSECUTORS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC SPENDING PUBLIC SUPPORT PUNISHMENT REGULATORY CAPTURE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RIGHT TO INFORMATION RISK OF CORRUPTION RULE OF LAW SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE PROVIDERS SMUGGLING SOCIAL CAPITAL SOVEREIGNTY STATE ASSETS STATE ENTERPRISES STATE FINANCE TRANSPARENCY VOTING |
| spellingShingle |
CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION IN POLITICS DEMOCRATIZATION FINANCIAL CRISES POLITICAL FACTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING PUBLIC EXPENDITURES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCUREMENT FISCAL ADMINISTRATION FORESTRY ECONOMICS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT JUDICIAL PROCESS CIVIL SERVICE BUDGET PROCESS LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BANKING SYSTEMS ELECTRIC POWER FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT COURT PROCEDURES DONOR FINANCE ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ANTI-CORRUPTION AUDITING AUTHORITY BENEFICIARIES BRIBES BUDGET CYCLE CITIZEN CITIZENS CIVIL SERVANTS CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY CLEAN GOVERNMENT COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINTS CONSULTATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION CORRUPTION LEVELS COURT SYSTEM DECENTRALIZATION DECREES DEMOCRACY DISCLOSURE DISTRICTS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC ELITES ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMIC REFORMS ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES FIGHTING CORRUPTION FIGURES FINANCIAL CRISIS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FOREIGN INVESTORS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE ISSUES GOVERNANCE REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS INCOME INCOME LEVELS INTEGRITY INVESTIGATIONS JUSTICE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY LAWS LEGAL ACTION LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL SYSTEM LEGISLATION LEGITIMACY LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL POLITICIANS MEDIA NATIONS NATURAL RESOURCES OPENNESS PARLIAMENT PARTICIPATORY BUDGET PENALTIES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PETTY CORRUPTION POLICY CREDIBILITY POLICY IMPLICATIONS POLITICAL COMPETITION POLITICAL ECONOMY POLITICAL ELITE POLITICAL FORCES POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL MANAGEMENT POLITICAL PARTIES POLITICAL PARTY POLITICAL SURVIVAL POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRESIDENCY PRIORITIES PROJECT DESIGN PROSECUTORS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC SPENDING PUBLIC SUPPORT PUNISHMENT REGULATORY CAPTURE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RIGHT TO INFORMATION RISK OF CORRUPTION RULE OF LAW SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE PROVIDERS SMUGGLING SOCIAL CAPITAL SOVEREIGNTY STATE ASSETS STATE ENTERPRISES STATE FINANCE TRANSPARENCY VOTING World Bank Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| geographic_facet |
East Asia and Pacific Indonesia |
| description |
Given steady progress in the development
of democracy - establishment of effective checks on
arbitrary rulers, replacement of arbitrary rules with just
and honest ones, and, participation of ordinary people in
the making of rules - Indonesia could over time, emerge as a
strong functioning democracy. Yet, continued progress
towards a full-fledged democracy cannot be taken for
granted, precisely because the transition to an elected
government has been a largely peaceful one, indeed allowed
the powerful interests that dominated the New Order-the
former First Family, the military, and the conglomerates-to
continue to operate, and indeed flourish in this new
environment. It is in this context the problem of corruption
in Indonesia must be viewed. This report is an initial
outcome of an ongoing process of rethinking, and learning by
the Bank, on issues of accountability, and corruption in
Indonesia. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, and
related political upheaval, the Bank revisited its entire
strategy towards the country. The report builds on a
comprehensive set of diagnostic assessments, and reviews on
some of the main areas where corruption breeds: public
expenditure and financial management systems, procurement,
inter-governmental fiscal relations, the financial sector,
forestry and infrastructure, the justice sector, and the
civil service. It also attempts to distill from studies the
key lessons learnt about corruption, and accountability,
and, to better understand how corruption works in particular
sectors, and processes. The central issue examined in this
report is why public accountability fails so often, and,
after analyzing the context in which anti-corruption efforts
must operate in Indonesia, the report focuses first on three
areas of corruption: the budget, local governments and the
government's regulatory functions in selected sectors -
banking, electricity and forestry. It then looks at the
justice sector - the police, the prosecutors, the courts and
the Indonesian civil service. Finally, it analyzes how
donors are responding to the challenge of corruption,
drawing primarily on the Bank's own experience. |
| format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Public Sector Study |
| author |
World Bank |
| author_facet |
World Bank |
| author_sort |
World Bank |
| title |
Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| title_short |
Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| title_full |
Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| title_fullStr |
Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development |
| title_sort |
combating corruption in indonesia : enhancing accountability for development |
| publisher |
Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/11/2803689/indonesia-combating-corruption-indonesia-enhancing-accountability-development http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14652 |
| _version_ |
1764428314200506368 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-146522021-04-23T14:03:17Z Combating Corruption in Indonesia : Enhancing Accountability for Development World Bank CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION IN POLITICS DEMOCRATIZATION FINANCIAL CRISES POLITICAL FACTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING PUBLIC EXPENDITURES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCUREMENT FISCAL ADMINISTRATION FORESTRY ECONOMICS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT JUDICIAL PROCESS CIVIL SERVICE BUDGET PROCESS LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK BANKING SYSTEMS ELECTRIC POWER FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT COURT PROCEDURES DONOR FINANCE ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ANTI-CORRUPTION AUDITING AUTHORITY BENEFICIARIES BRIBES BUDGET CYCLE CITIZEN CITIZENS CIVIL SERVANTS CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY CLEAN GOVERNMENT COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINTS CONSULTATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION CORRUPTION LEVELS COURT SYSTEM DECENTRALIZATION DECREES DEMOCRACY DISCLOSURE DISTRICTS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC ELITES ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMIC REFORMS ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES FIGHTING CORRUPTION FIGURES FINANCIAL CRISIS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FOREIGN INVESTORS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE ISSUES GOVERNANCE REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS INCOME INCOME LEVELS INTEGRITY INVESTIGATIONS JUSTICE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY LAWS LEGAL ACTION LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL SYSTEM LEGISLATION LEGITIMACY LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL POLITICIANS MEDIA NATIONS NATURAL RESOURCES OPENNESS PARLIAMENT PARTICIPATORY BUDGET PENALTIES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PETTY CORRUPTION POLICY CREDIBILITY POLICY IMPLICATIONS POLITICAL COMPETITION POLITICAL ECONOMY POLITICAL ELITE POLITICAL FORCES POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL MANAGEMENT POLITICAL PARTIES POLITICAL PARTY POLITICAL SURVIVAL POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PRESIDENCY PRIORITIES PROJECT DESIGN PROSECUTORS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC SPENDING PUBLIC SUPPORT PUNISHMENT REGULATORY CAPTURE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RIGHT TO INFORMATION RISK OF CORRUPTION RULE OF LAW SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE PROVIDERS SMUGGLING SOCIAL CAPITAL SOVEREIGNTY STATE ASSETS STATE ENTERPRISES STATE FINANCE TRANSPARENCY VOTING Given steady progress in the development of democracy - establishment of effective checks on arbitrary rulers, replacement of arbitrary rules with just and honest ones, and, participation of ordinary people in the making of rules - Indonesia could over time, emerge as a strong functioning democracy. Yet, continued progress towards a full-fledged democracy cannot be taken for granted, precisely because the transition to an elected government has been a largely peaceful one, indeed allowed the powerful interests that dominated the New Order-the former First Family, the military, and the conglomerates-to continue to operate, and indeed flourish in this new environment. It is in this context the problem of corruption in Indonesia must be viewed. This report is an initial outcome of an ongoing process of rethinking, and learning by the Bank, on issues of accountability, and corruption in Indonesia. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, and related political upheaval, the Bank revisited its entire strategy towards the country. The report builds on a comprehensive set of diagnostic assessments, and reviews on some of the main areas where corruption breeds: public expenditure and financial management systems, procurement, inter-governmental fiscal relations, the financial sector, forestry and infrastructure, the justice sector, and the civil service. It also attempts to distill from studies the key lessons learnt about corruption, and accountability, and, to better understand how corruption works in particular sectors, and processes. The central issue examined in this report is why public accountability fails so often, and, after analyzing the context in which anti-corruption efforts must operate in Indonesia, the report focuses first on three areas of corruption: the budget, local governments and the government's regulatory functions in selected sectors - banking, electricity and forestry. It then looks at the justice sector - the police, the prosecutors, the courts and the Indonesian civil service. Finally, it analyzes how donors are responding to the challenge of corruption, drawing primarily on the Bank's own experience. 2013-07-29T21:16:06Z 2013-07-29T21:16:06Z 2003-11-12 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/11/2803689/indonesia-combating-corruption-indonesia-enhancing-accountability-development http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14652 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Other Public Sector Study Economic & Sector Work East Asia and Pacific Indonesia |