Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management
This report, the first Public Expenditure Review of Belarus, will remain focused on broad systemic questions. A number of the problems emphasized in the subsequent chapters fall into four broad categories. These categories are all closely interrela...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2462985/belarus-strengthening-public-resource-management http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14618 |
id |
okr-10986-14618 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
ACCOUNT ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTS ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY APPROPRIATIONS AUDITING AUDITORS AUTHORITY AUTONOMY BANKING SECTOR BILLS BUDGET CLASSIFICATION BUDGET DEFICIT BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET PROCESS BUDGET SYSTEM BUDGETARY ALLOCATION BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETARY ASSISTANCE BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS BUDGETARY PROCESS BUDGETARY PROCESSES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES CAPITAL FORMATION CASH MANAGEMENT COMMERCIAL BANKS CONSENSUS CONSOLIDATED EXPENDITURES CONSOLIDATION COST EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL OF MINISTERS CPI CROSS SUBSIDIES DEBT DEBT SERVICING DEFICITS DEPOSITS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVE ALLOCATION EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE RATE EXECUTING AGENCIES EXECUTION EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES EXPENDITURE OBLIGATIONS EXPENDITURE REFORM EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICY FISCAL REFORM FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT FOREIGN RESERVES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT FINANCE GOVERNMENT REVENUES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HOUSING IMPORTS INCOME INFLATION INTEREST RATES INVENTORIES INVENTORY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL REGULATIONS LEGALITY LEGISLATION LOAN GUARANTEES LOBBYING MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MANDATES MARKET VALUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS OPPORTUNITY COSTS PENSIONS POLICY MAKERS PRICE SUBSIDIES PRIVATE SECTOR PROFITABILITY PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS PUBLIC BUDGETING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REFORM PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY PUBLIC UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL PROTECTION SOCIAL SAFETY SOCIAL SAFETY NET SOCIAL SECURITY STATE BUDGET STATE BUDGETS STATE CONTROL STATE FINANCE STATE OWNERSHIP STATE PROCUREMENT STATE RESOURCES STATE SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TAX TAX COLLECTION TAX DISCIPLINE TAX SYSTEM TAXATION TRADEOFFS TRANSITION ECONOMIES TRANSPARENCY TRANSPORT TREASURY WAGES PUBLIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY BUDGET POLICY & PLANNING FISCAL MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAMS SUBSIDIES SECTOR STRATEGIES REVENUES EXPENDITURE BUDGET ANALYSIS INFLATION INFORMATION ACCESS POLICY |
spellingShingle |
ACCOUNT ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTS ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY APPROPRIATIONS AUDITING AUDITORS AUTHORITY AUTONOMY BANKING SECTOR BILLS BUDGET CLASSIFICATION BUDGET DEFICIT BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET PROCESS BUDGET SYSTEM BUDGETARY ALLOCATION BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETARY ASSISTANCE BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS BUDGETARY PROCESS BUDGETARY PROCESSES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES CAPITAL FORMATION CASH MANAGEMENT COMMERCIAL BANKS CONSENSUS CONSOLIDATED EXPENDITURES CONSOLIDATION COST EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL OF MINISTERS CPI CROSS SUBSIDIES DEBT DEBT SERVICING DEFICITS DEPOSITS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVE ALLOCATION EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE RATE EXECUTING AGENCIES EXECUTION EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES EXPENDITURE OBLIGATIONS EXPENDITURE REFORM EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICY FISCAL REFORM FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT FOREIGN RESERVES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT FINANCE GOVERNMENT REVENUES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HOUSING IMPORTS INCOME INFLATION INTEREST RATES INVENTORIES INVENTORY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL REGULATIONS LEGALITY LEGISLATION LOAN GUARANTEES LOBBYING MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MANDATES MARKET VALUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS OPPORTUNITY COSTS PENSIONS POLICY MAKERS PRICE SUBSIDIES PRIVATE SECTOR PROFITABILITY PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS PUBLIC BUDGETING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REFORM PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY PUBLIC UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL PROTECTION SOCIAL SAFETY SOCIAL SAFETY NET SOCIAL SECURITY STATE BUDGET STATE BUDGETS STATE CONTROL STATE FINANCE STATE OWNERSHIP STATE PROCUREMENT STATE RESOURCES STATE SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TAX TAX COLLECTION TAX DISCIPLINE TAX SYSTEM TAXATION TRADEOFFS TRANSITION ECONOMIES TRANSPARENCY TRANSPORT TREASURY WAGES PUBLIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY BUDGET POLICY & PLANNING FISCAL MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAMS SUBSIDIES SECTOR STRATEGIES REVENUES EXPENDITURE BUDGET ANALYSIS INFLATION INFORMATION ACCESS POLICY World Bank Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Belarus |
relation |
Public expenditure review (PER); |
description |
This report, the first Public
Expenditure Review of Belarus, will remain focused on broad
systemic questions. A number of the problems emphasized in
the subsequent chapters fall into four broad categories.
These categories are all closely interrelated: The
complicated array of extrabudgetary and quasi-fiscal sources
of state finance imposes substantial losses on the economy.
Budgetary preparation and approval lacks focus, realism, and
an appropriate balance of political influence. The
implementation of the budget suffers from excessively weak
legality, and allows for too much discretion in the
allocation and re-allocation of state expenditures. The
connection between state objectives and public expenditures
is often unclear or weak. There are many recommendations for
changes that could help to improve fiscal discipline,
strengthen allocative effectiveness and improve the
technical efficiency, we present the most critical actions
that are needed: Improve realism in budgetary planning and
the management of state obligations. Develop institutions to
support commitment to budgetary implementation. Expand the
coverage of the budget to account for most activities with
fiscal impact. Develop a framework for identifying,
quantifying and addressing fiscal risks. Develop a
sustainable wage and compensation policy. Streamline
subsidies to the productive sectors. Focus on development of
sector strategies, one or two sectors at a time: identify
objectives, determine performance measures and the links
between inputs and positive outcomes. Improve the short and
medium term revenue and expenditure forecasting capacity.
Put in place systematic rules for budget revision. Introduce
guidelines for the allocation of resources in the event of
unexpected inflation, cash shortages, or surpluses. Develop
a concept of accountability beyond the Ministry of Finance
and budget. |
format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review |
author |
World Bank |
author_facet |
World Bank |
author_sort |
World Bank |
title |
Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
title_short |
Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
title_full |
Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
title_fullStr |
Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management |
title_sort |
belarus : strengthening public resource management |
publisher |
Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2462985/belarus-strengthening-public-resource-management http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14618 |
_version_ |
1764428065902952448 |
spelling |
okr-10986-146182021-04-23T14:03:16Z Belarus : Strengthening Public Resource Management World Bank ACCOUNT ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTS ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY APPROPRIATIONS AUDITING AUDITORS AUTHORITY AUTONOMY BANKING SECTOR BILLS BUDGET CLASSIFICATION BUDGET DEFICIT BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET PROCESS BUDGET SYSTEM BUDGETARY ALLOCATION BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETARY ASSISTANCE BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS BUDGETARY PROCESS BUDGETARY PROCESSES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES CAPITAL FORMATION CASH MANAGEMENT COMMERCIAL BANKS CONSENSUS CONSOLIDATED EXPENDITURES CONSOLIDATION COST EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL OF MINISTERS CPI CROSS SUBSIDIES DEBT DEBT SERVICING DEFICITS DEPOSITS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVE ALLOCATION EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE RATE EXECUTING AGENCIES EXECUTION EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES EXPENDITURE OBLIGATIONS EXPENDITURE REFORM EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FISCAL DISCIPLINE FISCAL POLICY FISCAL REFORM FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT FOREIGN RESERVES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT FINANCE GOVERNMENT REVENUES GOVERNMENT SPENDING HOUSING IMPORTS INCOME INFLATION INTEREST RATES INVENTORIES INVENTORY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL REGULATIONS LEGALITY LEGISLATION LOAN GUARANTEES LOBBYING MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MANDATES MARKET VALUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS OPPORTUNITY COSTS PENSIONS POLICY MAKERS PRICE SUBSIDIES PRIVATE SECTOR PROFITABILITY PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS PUBLIC BUDGETING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REFORM PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW PUBLIC EXPENDITURES PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY PUBLIC UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL PROTECTION SOCIAL SAFETY SOCIAL SAFETY NET SOCIAL SECURITY STATE BUDGET STATE BUDGETS STATE CONTROL STATE FINANCE STATE OWNERSHIP STATE PROCUREMENT STATE RESOURCES STATE SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TAX TAX COLLECTION TAX DISCIPLINE TAX SYSTEM TAXATION TRADEOFFS TRANSITION ECONOMIES TRANSPARENCY TRANSPORT TREASURY WAGES PUBLIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY BUDGET POLICY & PLANNING FISCAL MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PROGRAMS SUBSIDIES SECTOR STRATEGIES REVENUES EXPENDITURE BUDGET ANALYSIS INFLATION INFORMATION ACCESS POLICY This report, the first Public Expenditure Review of Belarus, will remain focused on broad systemic questions. A number of the problems emphasized in the subsequent chapters fall into four broad categories. These categories are all closely interrelated: The complicated array of extrabudgetary and quasi-fiscal sources of state finance imposes substantial losses on the economy. Budgetary preparation and approval lacks focus, realism, and an appropriate balance of political influence. The implementation of the budget suffers from excessively weak legality, and allows for too much discretion in the allocation and re-allocation of state expenditures. The connection between state objectives and public expenditures is often unclear or weak. There are many recommendations for changes that could help to improve fiscal discipline, strengthen allocative effectiveness and improve the technical efficiency, we present the most critical actions that are needed: Improve realism in budgetary planning and the management of state obligations. Develop institutions to support commitment to budgetary implementation. Expand the coverage of the budget to account for most activities with fiscal impact. Develop a framework for identifying, quantifying and addressing fiscal risks. Develop a sustainable wage and compensation policy. Streamline subsidies to the productive sectors. Focus on development of sector strategies, one or two sectors at a time: identify objectives, determine performance measures and the links between inputs and positive outcomes. Improve the short and medium term revenue and expenditure forecasting capacity. Put in place systematic rules for budget revision. Introduce guidelines for the allocation of resources in the event of unexpected inflation, cash shortages, or surpluses. Develop a concept of accountability beyond the Ministry of Finance and budget. 2013-07-26T16:33:35Z 2013-07-26T16:33:35Z 2003-06-20 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2462985/belarus-strengthening-public-resource-management http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14618 English en_US Public expenditure review (PER); CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review Economic & Sector Work Europe and Central Asia Belarus |