The United Republic of Tanzania : Public Expenditure Review
This public expenditure review (PER) examines the budget performance for FY00- and the first eight months of FY01, when domestic revenue remained at the same low level as in the previous year (1.15 percent of GDP), while expenditures increased in F...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Public Expenditure Review |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/1760784/tanzania-public-expenditure-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14607 |
Summary: | This public expenditure review (PER)
examines the budget performance for FY00- and the first
eight months of FY01, when domestic revenue remained at the
same low level as in the previous year (1.15 percent of
GDP), while expenditures increased in FY00 by one percentage
point, i.e., 15.9 percent of GDP. Some progress has been
made in enhancing funding for priority activities in the
areas or primary education, health care, roads and water,
with most of the increased spending being at the district
level. Likewise, progress has been made in bringing a
greater share of donor financed development spending into
the budget. Nonetheless, deviations between the budget
presented at the National Assembly, and expenditure
outturns, remain significant, especially for non-priority
sectors, and, contingency funds retained by the Ministry of
Finance are substantial. It is highlighted that problems in
public expenditure management persist, being the main one
the mismatch between available resources, and the intended
scope of Government activities. Under-funding of budgets
undermines prudent budget management, thus recommendations
suggest reviews by Government to ensure fully funded
expenditures for FY02. Recommendations to ease the mismatch
between monthly cash requirements, and exchequer releases,
suggest the presentation of a cash flow plan to conform to
aggregate ceilings, as an instrument to respect overall
yearly budget ceilings, but separating contingency
provisions to minimize unforeseen expenditures. Concerning
payment arrears, a relief program is recommended to clear
the debt stock of poor local authorities. |
---|