id okr-10986-14124
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-141242021-04-23T14:03:21Z Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff? Lopez, J. Humberto AVERAGE INCOME CONFLICT DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS ECONOMIC GROWTH ELASTICITIES ELASTICITY OF POVERTY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE EMPIRICAL STUDIES EXCHANGE RATE EXPENDITURES GDP GINI COEFFICIENT GINI INDEX GROWTH RATE HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS INCOME INCOME DISTRIBUTION INCOME INEQUALITY INCOME LEVELS INEQUALITY INFLATION INFLATION RATE INTERVENTION LIBERALIZATION MACROECONOMIC STABILITY OIL PER CAPITA INCOME PER CAPITA INCOME LEVELS POLITICAL ECONOMY POVERTY LINE POVERTY MEASURES POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS REDUCING POVERTY SQUARED POVERTY GAP STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TERMS OF TRADE Is a pro-growth strategy always the best pro-poor strategy? To address this issue, the author provides an empirical evaluation of the impact of a series of pro-growth policies on inequality and headcount poverty. He relies on a large macroeconomic data set and estimate dynamic panel models that allows him to differentiate between the short- and long-run impacts of the policies under consideration on growth, inequality, and poverty. The author's findings indicate that regardless of their impact on inequality, pro-growth policies lead to lower poverty levels in the long run. However, he also finds evidence indicating that some of these policies may lead to higher inequality and, under plausible assumptions for the distribution of income, to higher poverty levels in the short run. These findings would justify the adoption of a pro-growth policy package as the center of any poverty reduction strategy, together with pro-poor measures that complement such a package by offsetting potential short-run increases in poverty. 2013-06-21T18:43:55Z 2013-06-21T18:43:55Z 2004-08 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/08/5141895/pro-growth-pro-poor-tradeoff http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14124 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No.3378 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, D.C. Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic AVERAGE INCOME
CONFLICT
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELASTICITIES
ELASTICITY OF POVERTY
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
EMPIRICAL STUDIES
EXCHANGE RATE
EXPENDITURES
GDP
GINI COEFFICIENT
GINI INDEX
GROWTH RATE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME LEVELS
INEQUALITY
INFLATION
INFLATION RATE
INTERVENTION
LIBERALIZATION
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
OIL
PER CAPITA INCOME
PER CAPITA INCOME LEVELS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY REDUCTION
PROGRAMS
REDUCING POVERTY
SQUARED POVERTY GAP
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
TERMS OF TRADE
spellingShingle AVERAGE INCOME
CONFLICT
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELASTICITIES
ELASTICITY OF POVERTY
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
EMPIRICAL STUDIES
EXCHANGE RATE
EXPENDITURES
GDP
GINI COEFFICIENT
GINI INDEX
GROWTH RATE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME LEVELS
INEQUALITY
INFLATION
INFLATION RATE
INTERVENTION
LIBERALIZATION
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
OIL
PER CAPITA INCOME
PER CAPITA INCOME LEVELS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY REDUCTION
PROGRAMS
REDUCING POVERTY
SQUARED POVERTY GAP
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
TERMS OF TRADE
Lopez, J. Humberto
Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No.3378
description Is a pro-growth strategy always the best pro-poor strategy? To address this issue, the author provides an empirical evaluation of the impact of a series of pro-growth policies on inequality and headcount poverty. He relies on a large macroeconomic data set and estimate dynamic panel models that allows him to differentiate between the short- and long-run impacts of the policies under consideration on growth, inequality, and poverty. The author's findings indicate that regardless of their impact on inequality, pro-growth policies lead to lower poverty levels in the long run. However, he also finds evidence indicating that some of these policies may lead to higher inequality and, under plausible assumptions for the distribution of income, to higher poverty levels in the short run. These findings would justify the adoption of a pro-growth policy package as the center of any poverty reduction strategy, together with pro-poor measures that complement such a package by offsetting potential short-run increases in poverty.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Lopez, J. Humberto
author_facet Lopez, J. Humberto
author_sort Lopez, J. Humberto
title Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
title_short Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
title_full Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
title_fullStr Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
title_full_unstemmed Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor: Is There a Tradeoff?
title_sort pro-growth, pro-poor: is there a tradeoff?
publisher World Bank, Washington, D.C.
publishDate 2013
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/08/5141895/pro-growth-pro-poor-tradeoff
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14124
_version_ 1764430562599108608