Effectiveness of Community Health Financing in Meeting the Cost of Illness
How to finance and provide health care for the more than 1.3 billion rural poor and informal sector workers in low- and middle-income countries is one of the greatest challenges facing the international development community. This article presents...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/02/3583974/effectiveness-community-health-financing-meeting-cost-illness http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13778 |
Summary: | How to finance and provide health care
for the more than 1.3 billion rural poor and informal sector
workers in low- and middle-income countries is one of the
greatest challenges facing the international development
community. This article presents the main findings from an
extensive survey of the literature of community financing
arrangements, and selected experiences from the Asia and
Africa regions. Most community financing schemes have
evolved in the context of severe economic constraints,
political instability, and lack of good governance.
Micro-level household data analysis indicates that community
financing improves access by rural and informal sector
workers to needed heath care and provides them with some
financial protection against the cost of illness.
Macro-level cross-country analysis gives empirical support
to the hypothesis that risk-sharing in health financing
matters in terms of its impact on both the level and
distribution of health, financial fairness and
responsiveness indicators. The background research done for
this article points to five key policies available to
governments to improve the effectiveness and sustainability
of existing community financing schemes. This includes: (a)
increased and well-targeted subsidies to pay for the
premiums of low-income populations; (b) insurance to protect
against expenditure fluctuations and re-insurance to enlarge
the effective size of small risk pools; (c) effective
prevention and case management techniques to limit
expenditure fluctuations; (d) technical support to
strengthen the management capacity of local schemes; and (e)
establishment and strengthening of links with the formal
financing and provider networks. |
---|