Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions
Global poverty is a huge problem in today's world. This survey article seeks to be a first guide to those who are interested in, but relatively unfamiliar with, the main issues, positions and arguments in the contemporary philosophical discussion of global poverty. The article attempts to give...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13365 |
id |
okr-10986-13365 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-133652021-04-23T14:03:08Z Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions Gauri, Varun Sonderholm, Jorn political philosophy global justice Global poverty is a huge problem in today's world. This survey article seeks to be a first guide to those who are interested in, but relatively unfamiliar with, the main issues, positions and arguments in the contemporary philosophical discussion of global poverty. The article attempts to give an overview of four distinct and influential normative positions on global poverty. Moreover, it seeks to clarify, and put into perspective, some of the key concepts and issues that take center stage in the philosophical discussion of global poverty. The four positions to be discussed are labeled the Maximalist Position, the Minimalist Position, Intermediate Position I and Intermediate Position II. After an account of these four distinct positions, we turn, in the conclusion, to a discussion of what role empirical sciences such as economics and political science should play in normative considerations about global poverty. 2013-05-10T18:16:14Z 2013-05-10T18:16:14Z 2012-09-10 Journal Article Journal of Global Ethics 1744-9626 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13365 en_US Journal of Global Ethics;8(2-3) CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ World Bank Taylor and Francis Publications & Research :: Journal Article Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
en_US |
topic |
political philosophy global justice |
spellingShingle |
political philosophy global justice Gauri, Varun Sonderholm, Jorn Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
relation |
Journal of Global Ethics;8(2-3) |
description |
Global poverty is a huge problem in today's world. This survey article seeks to be a first guide to those who are interested in, but relatively unfamiliar with, the main issues, positions and arguments in the contemporary philosophical discussion of global poverty. The article attempts to give an overview of four distinct and influential normative positions on global poverty. Moreover, it seeks to clarify, and put into perspective, some of the key concepts and issues that take center stage in the philosophical discussion of global poverty. The four positions to be discussed are labeled the Maximalist Position, the Minimalist Position, Intermediate Position I and Intermediate Position II. After an account of these four distinct positions, we turn, in the conclusion, to a discussion of what role empirical sciences such as economics and political science should play in normative considerations about global poverty. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Gauri, Varun Sonderholm, Jorn |
author_facet |
Gauri, Varun Sonderholm, Jorn |
author_sort |
Gauri, Varun |
title |
Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
title_short |
Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
title_full |
Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
title_fullStr |
Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global Poverty : Four Normative Positions |
title_sort |
global poverty : four normative positions |
publisher |
Taylor and Francis |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13365 |
_version_ |
1764423318640787456 |