Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector

The Sudan referendum on post-Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) arrangements was held during January 9-15, 2011 with results in favor of secession of the South by July 9, 2011. The economic effects will transmit largely through the fiscal and exte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	World Bank
Format:	Public Expenditure Review
Language:	English en_US
Published:	Washington, DC 2013
Subjects:	ECONOMIC STABILITY FLOW OF FUNDS HEALTH SECTOR PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES SECESSION IMPACT SERVICES DELIVERY STATE BUDGETS STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
Online Access:	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/12/17012611/sudan-public-expenditure-tracking-survey-pets-case-study-health-sector http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12265

id	okr-10986-12265
recordtype	oai_dc
spelling	okr-10986-122652021-04-23T14:03:00Z Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector World Bank ECONOMIC STABILITY FLOW OF FUNDS HEALTH SECTOR PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING SECESSION IMPACT SERVICES DELIVERY STATE BUDGETS STATE RESPONSIBILITIES The Sudan referendum on post-Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) arrangements was held during January 9-15, 2011 with results in favor of secession of the South by July 9, 2011. The economic effects will transmit largely through the fiscal and external accounts and the outcome of secession negotiations will determine the post-CPA economic landscape. The secession outcome will likely put significant strain on economic stability in the North. The PETS study is organized as follows: chapter two presents the objectives of the study, and the survey methodology and sampling size. Chapter three focuses on the specific developments of budget data (functional classification) in the Northern States. The chapter sheds some light on revenues and expenditure in Northern States and also zooms into the specific responsibilities transferred to the states. Towards the end, the chapter addresses the budgets specifically of the six states that have been sampled for the study (in a purposive sample). Chapter four is the heart of the study and is based on the flow of funds analysis underlying the PET survey. It starts out with addressing the question on 'who' finances the health sector. With this it gives a good account of the decentralized nature of health services, which is a prerequisite to actually track public spending through the system. Chapter five explores the interconnections between public expenditure and service delivery in Sudan and tries to assess the effectiveness of public spending in contributing to the quality of health services. Chapter six concludes with a highlight of the findings and possible policy options. Annex one provides six short extracts of the main findings and conclusions for each state as additional case studies. 2013-02-06T23:29:43Z 2013-02-06T23:29:43Z 2011-12 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/12/17012611/sudan-public-expenditure-tracking-survey-pets-case-study-health-sector http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12265 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review Economic & Sector Work Africa Sudan
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Foreign Institution
institution	Digital Repositories
building	World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection	World Bank
language	English en_US
topic	ECONOMIC STABILITY FLOW OF FUNDS HEALTH SECTOR PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING SECESSION IMPACT SERVICES DELIVERY STATE BUDGETS STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
spellingShingle	ECONOMIC STABILITY FLOW OF FUNDS HEALTH SECTOR PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC SPENDING SECESSION IMPACT SERVICES DELIVERY STATE BUDGETS STATE RESPONSIBILITIES World Bank Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
geographic_facet	Africa Sudan
description	The Sudan referendum on post-Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) arrangements was held during January 9-15, 2011 with results in favor of secession of the South by July 9, 2011. The economic effects will transmit largely through the fiscal and external accounts and the outcome of secession negotiations will determine the post-CPA economic landscape. The secession outcome will likely put significant strain on economic stability in the North. The PETS study is organized as follows: chapter two presents the objectives of the study, and the survey methodology and sampling size. Chapter three focuses on the specific developments of budget data (functional classification) in the Northern States. The chapter sheds some light on revenues and expenditure in Northern States and also zooms into the specific responsibilities transferred to the states. Towards the end, the chapter addresses the budgets specifically of the six states that have been sampled for the study (in a purposive sample). Chapter four is the heart of the study and is based on the flow of funds analysis underlying the PET survey. It starts out with addressing the question on 'who' finances the health sector. With this it gives a good account of the decentralized nature of health services, which is a prerequisite to actually track public spending through the system. Chapter five explores the interconnections between public expenditure and service delivery in Sudan and tries to assess the effectiveness of public spending in contributing to the quality of health services. Chapter six concludes with a highlight of the findings and possible policy options. Annex one provides six short extracts of the main findings and conclusions for each state as additional case studies.
format	Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review
author	World Bank
author_facet	World Bank
author_sort	World Bank
title	Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
title_short	Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
title_full	Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
title_fullStr	Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
title_full_unstemmed	Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector
title_sort	sudan - public expenditure tracking survey (pets) : case study of the health sector
publisher	Washington, DC
publishDate	2013
url	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/12/17012611/sudan-public-expenditure-tracking-survey-pets-case-study-health-sector http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12265
_version_	1764419335344881664

Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health Sector

Similar Items