Weathering the Storm : Responses by Cambodian Firms to the Global Financial Crisis
Firms have various ways to cope with external risks. This paper analyzes the risk coping behavior that entails the smoothing of inputs (labor, raw materials, or capital). The theoretical framework shows that, if they face adjustment costs, firms pr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/10/16812612/weathering-storm-responses-cambodian-firms-global-financial-crisis http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12064 |
Summary: | Firms have various ways to cope with
external risks. This paper analyzes the risk coping behavior
that entails the smoothing of inputs (labor, raw materials,
or capital). The theoretical framework shows that, if they
face adjustment costs, firms prefer to smooth their inputs,
especially if they expect a demand shock to be temporary.
However, credit constrained firms will be adversely affected
by the presence of liquidity constraints, and this will
create a welfare loss due to incomplete smoothing. The
authors estimate this behavior using a panel of Cambodian
firms at the time of the 2008 global economic crisis. The
survey shows that these firms were hard hit by the economic
crisis between 2008 and 2009, with an average fall in demand
(sales) of 30 percent. Based on the theoretical framework,
the analysis can estimate the responsiveness of labor,
capital, and raw materials input demand to demand shocks. It
finds that firms try to smooth in particular if they believe
the shock is temporary; in fact non-credit constrained firms
reduce their inputs much less than firms that were credit
constrained when the demand shock is expected to be
temporary. The paper estimates that the welfare loss from
incomplete smoothing due to credit constraints is many
multiples of the adjustment costs of the firms that were not
credit constrained. This has important policy implications
about the role of financial sector development and
regulations beyond the capital market. This micro analysis
also has macro implications: if all firms expect a shock to
be permanent, their combined limited smoothing of inputs
will indeed make the shock more likely to be permanent. |
---|