More Relatively-Poor People in a Less Absolutely-Poor World
Relative deprivation, shame and social exclusion can matter to the welfare of people everywhere. The authors argue that such social effects on welfare call for a reconsideration of how we assess global poverty, but they do not support standard meas...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/07/16458176/more-relatively-poor-people-less-absolutely-poor-world http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11876 |
Summary: | Relative deprivation, shame and social
exclusion can matter to the welfare of people everywhere.
The authors argue that such social effects on welfare call
for a reconsideration of how we assess global poverty, but
they do not support standard measures of relative poverty.
The paper argues instead for using a weakly-relative measure
as the upper-bound complement to the lower-bound provided by
a standard absolute measure. New estimates of global poverty
are presented, drawing on 850 household surveys spanning 125
countries over 1981-2008. The absolute line is $1.25 a day
at 2005 prices, while the relative line rises with the mean,
at a gradient of 1:2 above $1.25 a day. The authors show
that these parameter choices are consistent with
cross-country data on national poverty lines. The results
indicate that the incidence of both absolute and
weakly-relative poverty in the developing world has been
falling since the 1990s, but more slowly for the relative
measure. While the number of absolutely poor has fallen, the
number of relatively poor has changed little since the
1990s, and is higher in 2008 than 1981. |
---|