Decentralizing Infrastructure Services : Lessons from the East Asia Experience
This document specifies, most east asian countries have increasingly shifted responsibilities for infrastructure services to subnational tiers of governments. Infrastructure service provision involves a broad set of functions, including setting inv...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/06/7034711/decentralizing-infrastructure-services-lessons-east-asia-experience http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11183 |
| Summary: | This document specifies, most east asian
countries have increasingly shifted responsibilities for
infrastructure services to subnational tiers of governments.
Infrastructure service provision involves a broad set of
functions, including setting investment priorities, building
and operating infrastructure facilities, and financing
capital and operation and maintenance requirements. The
extent to which each of these functions is transferred to
subnational agencies defines a country's
decentralization approach for infrastructure services.
Subnational governments also have significant leeway in
deciding how to mobilize funds for infrastructure projects.
The infrastructure projects focused in three countries
China, Indonesia, and the Philippines. In China, the central
government plays a prominent role in setting investment
priorities across infrastructure sectors. Indonesia and the
Philippines have adopted a big bang approach to
infrastructure decentralization. The report concludes,
despite the heterogeneous environments in which
decentralization has been implemented in the three
countries, important lessons can be learned by comparing how
each has fared in promoting regional coordination and
building accountability for infrastructure services in a
decentralized environment. |
|---|