id okr-10986-10623
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-106232021-04-23T14:02:51Z Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation World Bank BEST PRACTICE CLASSROOM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONTROL GROUPS DATA COLLECTION METHODS DIGITAL DIVIDE EDUCATION INDICATORS EDUCATION INITIATIVES EDUCATION INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL CHANGE EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL POLICY EDUCATORS EVALUATION ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONALITY HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY ICT IMPACT INDICATORS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION INNOVATIONS INTERVENTIONS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PILOT PROJECTS RESULTS SCHOOLS SITES TARGETING TEACHING TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USES Bias is a very real issue in most of the monitoring and evaluation work done of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education issues across the board. Such biases are often introduced at the monitoring and evaluation design stage, and include a lack of relevant and appropriate control groups, biases on the part of 'independent evaluators' (who often have a stake in seeing positive outcomes), and biases on the part of those evaluated (who may understandably seek to show that they have made good use of investments in ICTs to benefit education). The opportunity for such biases (which are usually positive biases) are especially acute where there a great reliance on self-reported data. There appears to be a lack of institutional and human resource capacity to carry out independent evaluations of ICT in education initiatives by local organizations in least development countries (LDCs) (which increases the cost of such activities and potentially decreases the likelihood that the results will be fed back into program design locally). A general lack of formal monitoring and evaluation activities inhibits the collection and dissemination of lessons learned from pilot projects and the useful formation of necessary feedback loops for such lessons learned to become an input into educational policy. Where such activities have occurred, they focus largely on program delivery, and are often specific to the project itself. 2012-08-13T12:27:24Z 2012-08-13T12:27:24Z 2008-01 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/10062964/knowledge-map-monitoring-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10623 English InfoDev CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic BEST PRACTICE
CLASSROOM
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
CONTROL GROUPS
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
DIGITAL DIVIDE
EDUCATION INDICATORS
EDUCATION INITIATIVES
EDUCATION INVESTMENTS
EDUCATIONAL CHANGE
EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
EDUCATORS
EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
FUNCTIONALITY
HARDWARE
HUMAN RESOURCE
HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY
ICT
IMPACT INDICATORS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INNOVATION
INNOVATIONS
INTERVENTIONS
KNOWLEDGE BASE
LEARNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
PILOT PROJECTS
RESULTS
SCHOOLS
SITES
TARGETING
TEACHING
TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
USES
spellingShingle BEST PRACTICE
CLASSROOM
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
CONTROL GROUPS
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
DIGITAL DIVIDE
EDUCATION INDICATORS
EDUCATION INITIATIVES
EDUCATION INVESTMENTS
EDUCATIONAL CHANGE
EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
EDUCATORS
EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
FUNCTIONALITY
HARDWARE
HUMAN RESOURCE
HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY
ICT
IMPACT INDICATORS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INNOVATION
INNOVATIONS
INTERVENTIONS
KNOWLEDGE BASE
LEARNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
PILOT PROJECTS
RESULTS
SCHOOLS
SITES
TARGETING
TEACHING
TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
USES
World Bank
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
relation InfoDev
description Bias is a very real issue in most of the monitoring and evaluation work done of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education issues across the board. Such biases are often introduced at the monitoring and evaluation design stage, and include a lack of relevant and appropriate control groups, biases on the part of 'independent evaluators' (who often have a stake in seeing positive outcomes), and biases on the part of those evaluated (who may understandably seek to show that they have made good use of investments in ICTs to benefit education). The opportunity for such biases (which are usually positive biases) are especially acute where there a great reliance on self-reported data. There appears to be a lack of institutional and human resource capacity to carry out independent evaluations of ICT in education initiatives by local organizations in least development countries (LDCs) (which increases the cost of such activities and potentially decreases the likelihood that the results will be fed back into program design locally). A general lack of formal monitoring and evaluation activities inhibits the collection and dissemination of lessons learned from pilot projects and the useful formation of necessary feedback loops for such lessons learned to become an input into educational policy. Where such activities have occurred, they focus largely on program delivery, and are often specific to the project itself.
format Publications & Research :: Brief
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
title_short Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
title_full Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
title_fullStr Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
title_sort knowledge map : monitoring and evaluation
publisher Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/10062964/knowledge-map-monitoring-evaluation
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10623
_version_ 1764413776006742016