Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation
Bias is a very real issue in most of the monitoring and evaluation work done of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education issues across the board. Such biases are often introduced at the monitoring and evaluation design stage, a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Brief |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/10062964/knowledge-map-monitoring-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10623 |
id |
okr-10986-10623 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-106232021-04-23T14:02:51Z Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation World Bank BEST PRACTICE CLASSROOM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONTROL GROUPS DATA COLLECTION METHODS DIGITAL DIVIDE EDUCATION INDICATORS EDUCATION INITIATIVES EDUCATION INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL CHANGE EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL POLICY EDUCATORS EVALUATION ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONALITY HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY ICT IMPACT INDICATORS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION INNOVATIONS INTERVENTIONS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PILOT PROJECTS RESULTS SCHOOLS SITES TARGETING TEACHING TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USES Bias is a very real issue in most of the monitoring and evaluation work done of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education issues across the board. Such biases are often introduced at the monitoring and evaluation design stage, and include a lack of relevant and appropriate control groups, biases on the part of 'independent evaluators' (who often have a stake in seeing positive outcomes), and biases on the part of those evaluated (who may understandably seek to show that they have made good use of investments in ICTs to benefit education). The opportunity for such biases (which are usually positive biases) are especially acute where there a great reliance on self-reported data. There appears to be a lack of institutional and human resource capacity to carry out independent evaluations of ICT in education initiatives by local organizations in least development countries (LDCs) (which increases the cost of such activities and potentially decreases the likelihood that the results will be fed back into program design locally). A general lack of formal monitoring and evaluation activities inhibits the collection and dissemination of lessons learned from pilot projects and the useful formation of necessary feedback loops for such lessons learned to become an input into educational policy. Where such activities have occurred, they focus largely on program delivery, and are often specific to the project itself. 2012-08-13T12:27:24Z 2012-08-13T12:27:24Z 2008-01 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/10062964/knowledge-map-monitoring-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10623 English InfoDev CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
BEST PRACTICE CLASSROOM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONTROL GROUPS DATA COLLECTION METHODS DIGITAL DIVIDE EDUCATION INDICATORS EDUCATION INITIATIVES EDUCATION INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL CHANGE EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL POLICY EDUCATORS EVALUATION ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONALITY HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY ICT IMPACT INDICATORS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION INNOVATIONS INTERVENTIONS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PILOT PROJECTS RESULTS SCHOOLS SITES TARGETING TEACHING TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USES |
spellingShingle |
BEST PRACTICE CLASSROOM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONTROL GROUPS DATA COLLECTION METHODS DIGITAL DIVIDE EDUCATION INDICATORS EDUCATION INITIATIVES EDUCATION INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL CHANGE EDUCATIONAL INVESTMENTS EDUCATIONAL POLICY EDUCATORS EVALUATION ACTIVITIES FUNCTIONALITY HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY ICT IMPACT INDICATORS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION INNOVATIONS INTERVENTIONS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PILOT PROJECTS RESULTS SCHOOLS SITES TARGETING TEACHING TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USES World Bank Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
relation |
InfoDev |
description |
Bias is a very real issue in most of the
monitoring and evaluation work done of information and
communication technologies (ICT) in education issues across
the board. Such biases are often introduced at the
monitoring and evaluation design stage, and include a lack
of relevant and appropriate control groups, biases on the
part of 'independent evaluators' (who often have a
stake in seeing positive outcomes), and biases on the part
of those evaluated (who may understandably seek to show that
they have made good use of investments in ICTs to benefit
education). The opportunity for such biases (which are
usually positive biases) are especially acute where there a
great reliance on self-reported data. There appears to be a
lack of institutional and human resource capacity to carry
out independent evaluations of ICT in education initiatives
by local organizations in least development countries (LDCs)
(which increases the cost of such activities and potentially
decreases the likelihood that the results will be fed back
into program design locally). A general lack of formal
monitoring and evaluation activities inhibits the collection
and dissemination of lessons learned from pilot projects and
the useful formation of necessary feedback loops for such
lessons learned to become an input into educational policy.
Where such activities have occurred, they focus largely on
program delivery, and are often specific to the project itself. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Brief |
author |
World Bank |
author_facet |
World Bank |
author_sort |
World Bank |
title |
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
title_short |
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
title_full |
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Knowledge Map : Monitoring and Evaluation |
title_sort |
knowledge map : monitoring and evaluation |
publisher |
Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/01/10062964/knowledge-map-monitoring-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10623 |
_version_ |
1764413776006742016 |