Quantum of proof when case for the prosecution depends substantially or wholly on circumstantial evidence: irresistible conclusion test or reasonable beyond a doubt test?
There seems to be apparent judicial conflict as to the quantum of evidence required when the case for the prosecution is based wholly or substantially on circumstantial evidence. The traditional preponderant view - is that to succeed, the prosecution must show that the circumstantial evidence must b...
Main Author: | Shair Mohamad, Mohd Akram |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Routledge
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/8503/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/8503/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/8503/1/2011_-_Quantum_of_proof_when_case_for_the_prosecution_depends_substantially__or_wholly_on_circumstantial_evidence-_irresistible_conclusion_test_or_reasonable_beyond_a_doubt_test.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Quantum of proof required when case for the prosecution depends substantially or wholly on circumstantial evidence: irresistible conclusion test or reasonable beyond a doubt test?
by: Shair Mohamad, Mohd Akram
Published: (2007) -
Circumstantial evidence -The standard of proof required in criminal cases / Ahmad Khairi Khairuddin
by: Khairuddin, Ahmad Khairi
Published: (1984) -
Conclusion
by: Mohammed Idris, Umar
Published: (2011) -
Conclusion
by: Zakariya, Hafiz, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Conclusion
by: Alginahi, Yasser M., et al.
Published: (2019)