Validation of the 28-day mortality prognostic performance of the modified nutrition risk in critically ill score in a Malaysian intensive care unit

Introduction: The mNUTRIC score is a nutritional assessment tool to identify critically ill patients with high nutritional risk who could benefit from nutritional interventions. This study was conducted to validate the 28-day mortality prognostic performance of the mNUTRIC score in a Malaysian inten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan Muhd Shukeri, Wan Fadzlina, Saeed, Samiullah, Md Ralib, Azrina, Mat Nor, Mohd Basri
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/79023/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/79023/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/79023/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/79023/1/Vol%2025%283%29%207.mjn.2019.0074_Basri.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/79023/7/79023_Validation%20of%20the%2028-day%20mortality_scopus.pdf
Description
Summary:Introduction: The mNUTRIC score is a nutritional assessment tool to identify critically ill patients with high nutritional risk who could benefit from nutritional interventions. This study was conducted to validate the 28-day mortality prognostic performance of the mNUTRIC score in a Malaysian intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2017 to December 2018 for >24 hours. Data were collected on variables required to calculate the mNUTRIC score. Patients with mNUTRIC score ≥5 points were considered to be at high nutritional risk. Main outcome was 28- day mortality from all causes; ICU length of stay (LOS) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) (>2 days) were secondary outcomes. Results: From a total of 432 admissions, 382 (88.4%) patients fulfilled the study criteria. Seventy-seven (20.2%) of these patients were at high nutritional risk. They had longer mean ICU LOS (7.1±7.5 days versus 4.2±4.0 days, p=0.001), greater proportion of prolonged MV (57.1% versus 14.4%, p<0.001) and higher 28-day mortality (44.2% versus 10.2%, p<0.001) compared to patients with low mNUTRIC score (≤4 points). High mNUTRIC score predicted 28-day mortality with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.797 (95% confidence interval: 0.738-0.856). Conclusion: High mNUTRIC score was associated with a higher 28-day mortality. The prognostic performance for 28-day mortality of the mNUTRIC score is clinically valid as indicated by AUC >0.7 and is comparable to the results of other validation studies. In addition, patients with high mNUTRIC score had increased ICU LOS and prolonged MV. Key words: Nutritional status, critically ill, mortality