Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Better epidemiologic information on childhood hearing loss would inform research priorities and efforts to prevent its progression. OBJECTIVES: To estimate prevalence and secular trends in children’s hearing loss. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 1996 to Aug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Jing, Sung, Valerie, Carew, Peter, Burt, Rachel A., Liu, Mengjiao, Wang, Yichao, Afandi, Aflah, Wake, Melissa
Format: Article
Language:English
English
English
Published: Elsevier 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/1/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_article.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/2/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/3/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_wos.pdf
id iium-75966
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
English
English
topic RB Pathology
RF Otorhinolaryngology
spellingShingle RB Pathology
RF Otorhinolaryngology
Wang, Jing
Sung, Valerie
Carew, Peter
Burt, Rachel A.
Liu, Mengjiao
Wang, Yichao
Afandi, Aflah
Wake, Melissa
Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description BACKGROUND: Better epidemiologic information on childhood hearing loss would inform research priorities and efforts to prevent its progression. OBJECTIVES: To estimate prevalence and secular trends in children’s hearing loss. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 1996 to August 2017. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included epidemiologic studies in English reporting hearing loss prevalence. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The modified Leboeuf-Yde and Lauritsen tool was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses combined study-specific estimates using random-effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Children 0 to 18 years of age. RESULTS: Among 88 eligible studies, 43.2% included audiometric measurement of speech frequencies. In meta-analyses, pooled prevalence estimates of slight or worse bilateral speech frequency losses >15 decibels hearing level (dB HL) were 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0−17.0). Using progressively more stringent cutpoints, pooled prevalence estimates were 8.1% (95% CI, 1.3−19.8) with >20 dB HL, 2.2% (95% CI, 1.4−3.0) with >25 dB HL, 1.8% (95% CI, 0.4−4.1) with >30 dB HL, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.1−2.6) with >40 dB HL. Also, 8.9% (95% CI, 6.4−12.3) had likely sensorineural losses >15 dB HL in 1 or both ears, and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.5−2.1) had self-reported hearing loss. From 1990 to 2010, the prevalence of losses >15 dB HL in 1 or both ears rose substantially (all P for trend <.001). LIMITATIONS: The studies had high heterogeneity and offered limited information for hearing loss types and secular trend. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Childhood slight or worse hearing loss is prevalent and may be increasing. Advances in understanding hearing loss trajectories, causes, and prevention would require international repositories and longitudinal studies with audiometric data beginning in childhood
format Article
author Wang, Jing
Sung, Valerie
Carew, Peter
Burt, Rachel A.
Liu, Mengjiao
Wang, Yichao
Afandi, Aflah
Wake, Melissa
author_facet Wang, Jing
Sung, Valerie
Carew, Peter
Burt, Rachel A.
Liu, Mengjiao
Wang, Yichao
Afandi, Aflah
Wake, Melissa
author_sort Wang, Jing
title Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2019
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/1/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_article.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/2/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/3/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_wos.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:47:26Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:47:26Z
_version_ 1777413543613693952
spelling iium-759662019-12-03T08:08:51Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/ Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Jing Sung, Valerie Carew, Peter Burt, Rachel A. Liu, Mengjiao Wang, Yichao Afandi, Aflah Wake, Melissa RB Pathology RF Otorhinolaryngology BACKGROUND: Better epidemiologic information on childhood hearing loss would inform research priorities and efforts to prevent its progression. OBJECTIVES: To estimate prevalence and secular trends in children’s hearing loss. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 1996 to August 2017. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included epidemiologic studies in English reporting hearing loss prevalence. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The modified Leboeuf-Yde and Lauritsen tool was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses combined study-specific estimates using random-effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Children 0 to 18 years of age. RESULTS: Among 88 eligible studies, 43.2% included audiometric measurement of speech frequencies. In meta-analyses, pooled prevalence estimates of slight or worse bilateral speech frequency losses >15 decibels hearing level (dB HL) were 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0−17.0). Using progressively more stringent cutpoints, pooled prevalence estimates were 8.1% (95% CI, 1.3−19.8) with >20 dB HL, 2.2% (95% CI, 1.4−3.0) with >25 dB HL, 1.8% (95% CI, 0.4−4.1) with >30 dB HL, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.1−2.6) with >40 dB HL. Also, 8.9% (95% CI, 6.4−12.3) had likely sensorineural losses >15 dB HL in 1 or both ears, and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.5−2.1) had self-reported hearing loss. From 1990 to 2010, the prevalence of losses >15 dB HL in 1 or both ears rose substantially (all P for trend <.001). LIMITATIONS: The studies had high heterogeneity and offered limited information for hearing loss types and secular trend. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Childhood slight or worse hearing loss is prevalent and may be increasing. Advances in understanding hearing loss trajectories, causes, and prevention would require international repositories and longitudinal studies with audiometric data beginning in childhood Elsevier 2019-07 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/1/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_article.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/2/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_scopus.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/75966/3/75966_Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Hearing%20Loss_wos.pdf Wang, Jing and Sung, Valerie and Carew, Peter and Burt, Rachel A. and Liu, Mengjiao and Wang, Yichao and Afandi, Aflah and Wake, Melissa (2019) Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Pediatrics, 19 (5). pp. 504-514. ISSN 18762859 E-ISSN 1876-2867 https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/277741/1-s2.0-S1876285918X00072/1-s2.0-S187628591830528X/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjENj%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJHMEUCIFpWVkpaHNHtFsNOj6BQcGy7dUfxJ4TdUOIkbO0gwn%2FdAiEA%2FtjdHxFV13%2BwmvbW2N8Fwb0GUjsPASGJyPXkqM%2BWRLEq0QIIERACGgwwNTkwMDM1NDY4NjUiDKXIn03gWFd3LrnowCquAn7Lh9hdeaPfCGMGuKkS1SLW%2BAbY1MPqTqG9X4P2ITWnR0U0wnLxXSJvtAoD%2Bjj2ZXeXTAA4%2BttqQZCLaVBFW4KPDOGC1JQZcNyPzkvMhtIhl33uU9InTcXL7EdrA4CGNfGKCeBDkYCDvQM0JjJ7QroL%2FtnCB3%2BLqgyeQrh5zRBO1xjEi9UOCwqfVmO4mQzFSNZMWbKQCbU9NMTSm%2FY7zyXc8gvbTILLUUgPEwJsaVn0HbIuxsDK68583A556TpwfDmpymYOsznRWLzZP2VlUEw75S8gXPyOddha7uiCFuV7Kb62hdgoS%2BD9jjHnByIxBj%2B%2Bp7eGJo16hKjdap3YboQTn%2Beou3zJkt88F%2FjNIU8JIGbg3pLfYAU1bPWb%2FY%2F864nqhOqoDyaXgxFT6WI1MJ2b3u4FOs4CAoa3wK%2BFMX%2Bu%2B5GvGIdcFMpDwjAsVYXpviTV3xvXIA1XqwmtSYAZpNZ062W%2FPy4y8shvrll2mXiJNbXBROHxVA%2FVOA6B%2Be2BrLFnKtTn5WrBDvaRpybsSY0WLU37gcKZ6xxxBR5US%2FZDvs9PhxggaIGVE%2BHABPSvCVS2eGJak5%2BH8A%2BlPfSoYVvAvAkR8zSmMKIYQ1u94rPVXRaIbFR53VP2igF9mcScBeBs5JNIr2YTeqcOYh38JutcbjrNiF5b8Y8VaH99FzMKZpkY0VehNbAw8QkNt0wRjAlp4GJtkcmghcmEbA5IHce4281VdAaQdw00Q1ue9odOKYm8rEpgK9sUAOToY1tvx6YhfYxMGLlaF1bHoD9DmoP4xbYZW7bLngEU4gIPPZdBBBmaijrNKygNz%2FVh9RlRe1c6G9zD7fVhpIZ3WyOsVjneD1blQw%3D%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20191122T075448Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTYVQJFGUS2%2F20191122%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=9771f7aead5e6acc11d3519afa1c392b00ed83d92230b1ff5b7a1de60ce2cb3a&hash=5cf8bd93879149dad4de65c3d081265f327eb0a3ed0008d0e25ca58d04fdf029&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S187628591830528X&tid=spdf-42310968-1cca-4756-baab-3076ac5ef135&sid=27f6091710532745f77b4629ecb951047a81gxrqb&type=client 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.010