An appraisal of the China’s claims in the South China Sea territorial disputes
Objective: This paper predominantly aims at evaluating the territorial claims made by China in the South China Sea as to whether or not these claims are in accordance with the contemporary international law. This study is primarily doctrinal and qualitative in nature. Analysis: China claims almos...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
R.K.Sharma, Institute of Medico-Legal Publications
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/68744/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/68744/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/68744/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/68744/1/68744_An%20appraisal%20of%20the%20China%E2%80%99s%20claims.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/68744/7/68744_An%20appraisal%20of%20the%20China%E2%80%99s%20claims_SCOPUS.pdf |
Summary: | Objective: This paper predominantly aims at evaluating the territorial claims made by China in the South
China Sea as to whether or not these claims are in accordance with the contemporary international law. This
study is primarily doctrinal and qualitative in nature.
Analysis: China claims almost 90 percent of the South China Sea by arguing that both maritime and land
territories in the region were regarded as integral parts of the Chinese nation since centuries ago. In the same
vein, other disputing parties also made numerous claims to their respective contiguous parts of the South
China Sea. Despite the fact that these nations have been trying to resolve the disputes, tensions among the
rival countries have steadily increased.
Method: The authors propose that China has to acquire the sovereignty over land territories in the South
China Sea in conformity with the modes of acquisition of state territory under contemporary international
law. Then, it can claim maritime boundaries on the basis of the land territory in accordance with the relevant
provisions under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982).
Findings: The paper greatly contributes to evaluate Chinese territorial claims in resolving the South China
Sea territorial disputes.
Result: It is thus proposed that the adjudicative settlement either before the International Court of Justice
(ICJ), the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) or an ad hoc international territorial
arbitration would be desirable between or among the parties to deliberate further on the disputes with the
view to maintain the international peace and security. |
---|