Reynolds Privilege Defence In Malaysia: The Aftermath Of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 2
This article follows from part 1 in which some observations were made by the authors on the Reynolds privilege defence and how it differed from the defence of qualified privilege. In part 1, the confusion that arose from a wrong plea of defences was extracted and brought to light. To continue in...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/67592/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/67592/1/Reynold%20Privilege%20%28part%202%29.pdf |
| Summary: | This article follows from part 1 in which some observations were made by
the authors on the Reynolds privilege defence and how it differed from the
defence of qualified privilege. In part 1, the confusion that arose from a
wrong plea of defences was extracted and brought to light. To continue in
this article, the authors submit that the confusion had surfaced with
variations of the defences pleaded, pre and post-Dr Syed Azman and Syarikat
Bekalan. Below are the cases that followed after the landmark case of Reynolds
v. Times Newspaper that had propounded the Reynolds privilege defence. The
purpose of the table is to show how the defence was pleaded in cases where
an action for defamation arose due to widespread publication of disparaging
words. |
|---|