Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1

The Reynolds privilege defence propounded in the well-known case of Reynolds v. Times Newspapers, 1 protects ‘responsible journalism’ in a claim for defamation. In deciding whether the publication occurred responsibly, Lord Nicholls set out ten indicative factors relating to the nature of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig, Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/1/67075_Reynolds%20Privilege%20Defence%20In%20Malaysia.pdf
id iium-67075
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-670752018-11-14T07:15:12Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/ Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1 Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali K Law (General) KPG Malaysia The Reynolds privilege defence propounded in the well-known case of Reynolds v. Times Newspapers, 1 protects ‘responsible journalism’ in a claim for defamation. In deciding whether the publication occurred responsibly, Lord Nicholls set out ten indicative factors relating to the nature of the publication, such as the seriousness of the allegation, the nature of the information, its source, if steps taken to verify the information, the urgency of the matter, if comments were sought from the claimant or contained the gist of the claimant’s side of the story and the tone of the article, among others. The defendant would need to show that the publication was made responsibly or reasonably to establish a form of duty-interest qualified privilege. Since 2001, when Malaysia first saw the application of the Reynolds principle in Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. Dato’ Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, 2 the Reynolds privilege defence has been used as a defence in many cases, and of such cases, Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said3 and Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee, 4 at the Federal Court level which have endorsed the use of this defence and in doing so, both cases have established the guidelines for its application. Before the Reynolds privilege defence was established, it had been difficult to determine if a duty-interest privilege would apply to widespread publications, but this appears to be possible after the decision in Reynolds. On the other hand, the traditional common law qualified privilege is to be discussed in comparison, as the Reynolds privilege in England found its roots from this defence. It is the source for the development of the Reynolds privilege defence. The link between the two defences is so close that it is often pleaded together and treated as one and the same defence which is seen to inhibit the growth and proper use of the Reynolds privilege defence as a defence on its own. Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/1/67075_Reynolds%20Privilege%20Defence%20In%20Malaysia.pdf Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig and Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali (2018) Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1. Malaysian Current Law Journal, 9. i-xiv. ISSN 0127-0699 https://www.cljlaw.com/
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
spellingShingle K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali
Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
description The Reynolds privilege defence propounded in the well-known case of Reynolds v. Times Newspapers, 1 protects ‘responsible journalism’ in a claim for defamation. In deciding whether the publication occurred responsibly, Lord Nicholls set out ten indicative factors relating to the nature of the publication, such as the seriousness of the allegation, the nature of the information, its source, if steps taken to verify the information, the urgency of the matter, if comments were sought from the claimant or contained the gist of the claimant’s side of the story and the tone of the article, among others. The defendant would need to show that the publication was made responsibly or reasonably to establish a form of duty-interest qualified privilege. Since 2001, when Malaysia first saw the application of the Reynolds principle in Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. Dato’ Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, 2 the Reynolds privilege defence has been used as a defence in many cases, and of such cases, Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said3 and Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee, 4 at the Federal Court level which have endorsed the use of this defence and in doing so, both cases have established the guidelines for its application. Before the Reynolds privilege defence was established, it had been difficult to determine if a duty-interest privilege would apply to widespread publications, but this appears to be possible after the decision in Reynolds. On the other hand, the traditional common law qualified privilege is to be discussed in comparison, as the Reynolds privilege in England found its roots from this defence. It is the source for the development of the Reynolds privilege defence. The link between the two defences is so close that it is often pleaded together and treated as one and the same defence which is seen to inhibit the growth and proper use of the Reynolds privilege defence as a defence on its own.
format Article
author Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali
author_facet Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali
author_sort Sardar Baig, Farheen Baig
title Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
title_short Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
title_full Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
title_fullStr Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
title_full_unstemmed Reynolds privilege defence in Malaysia: a review of Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Hj Ahmad Said [2015] 7 CLJ 180 And Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Tony Pua Kiam Wee [2015] 8 CLJ 477:Part 1
title_sort reynolds privilege defence in malaysia: a review of dr syed azman syed ahmad nawawi & ors v. dato’ seri hj ahmad said [2015] 7 clj 180 and syarikat bekalan air selangor sdn bhd v. tony pua kiam wee [2015] 8 clj 477:part 1
publisher Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn. Bhd.
publishDate 2018
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/67075/1/67075_Reynolds%20Privilege%20Defence%20In%20Malaysia.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:35:13Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:35:13Z
_version_ 1777412775794966528