The association between social cohesion and community disaster resilience: a cross‐sectional study
A cross‐sectional study design was created, using the Index of Perceived Community Resilience (IPCR) and Buckner’s Index of Cohesion (BIC) to survey 386 flood evacuees from six communities in Kelantan, Malaysia, in 2015. The respondents were mostly female (54.7%); lived in basic housing (95.6%);...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/67023/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/67023/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/67023/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/67023/1/The%20association%20between%20social%20cohesion%20and%20community_HSCC%20ISI.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/67023/7/67023_The%20association%20between%20social%20cohesion%20and%20community%20disaster%20resilience%20A%20cross-sectional%20study_wos.pdf |
| Summary: | A cross‐sectional study design was created, using the Index of Perceived Community
Resilience (IPCR) and Buckner’s Index of Cohesion (BIC) to survey 386 flood evacuees
from six communities in Kelantan, Malaysia, in 2015. The respondents were
mostly female (54.7%); lived in basic housing (95.6%); average income (55.9%); secondary
level schooling (81.1%); not involved with community organisations (95.1%),
volunteering activities (91.2%), or emergency teams (96.9%); inexperience with injury
during flooding (94%); experienced the emergency disaster (61.6%); and their mean
age was 49 years old. Overall, respondents scored a high level of community disaster
resilience (CDR) (mean 3.9) and social cohesion (mean 3.79). Also, respondents’ housing
type, event of injury during disaster, volunteering in post‐disaster activities, and
emergency team participation were significantly associated with CDR (p = 0.001–
0.002), organisational involvement (p = 0.016), and emergency disaster experience
(p = 0.028) were significantly associated with social cohesion. The Pearson correlation
coefficient results mostly showing a moderate, weak, and one with a strong relationship.
There is a strong relationship between community participation (CDR) in
events and BIC variables (r = 0.529, p = 0.001). Other analysis shows a moderate but
significant relationship with BIC; is open to ideas (r = 0.332, p = 0.001); community
has similar values/ideas (r = 0.421, p = 0.001); sense of pride (r = 0.389, p = 0.001);
strong leadership (r = 0.339, p = 0.001); positive change (r = 0.484, p = 0.001); and
able to handle problems (r = 0.454, p = 0.001). Overall, the results show that respondents
had high levels of CDR and social cohesion, while the demographic characteristics
show the impact of CDR and social cohesion. In conclusion, the data gives
original insight into the level of association between social cohesion and disaster resilience,
which could be used as a building block in sustainable disaster recovery.
There is a need to explore this further on programmes designed to improve social
cohesion across communities. |
|---|