Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer
The competing interests of a worker and an employer require that a worker’s security of tenure must be balanced against the just expectation of the employer for latitude, under genuine redundancy in the organisation, to retrench the surplus labour or workers. Such redundancy may arise due, among o...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Organization Center of Academic Research
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/7/66980%20MINIMIZING%20PSYCHOLOGICAL%20IMPACT.pdf |
id |
iium-66980 |
---|---|
recordtype |
eprints |
spelling |
iium-669802018-10-25T07:44:23Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/ Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ahmad, Muhamad Hassan Kasi, Arun KPG Malaysia The competing interests of a worker and an employer require that a worker’s security of tenure must be balanced against the just expectation of the employer for latitude, under genuine redundancy in the organisation, to retrench the surplus labour or workers. Such redundancy may arise due, among others, to a reduction of business activities, perceived advantages of greater mechanisation and technological change, deployment of capital resources in different ways, reorganisation of business operations with a view to enhancing profitability, and reducing losses either generally or in selected areas. For a retrenchment to be justified, there must be convincing grounds to establish redundancy. Whether a genuine redundancy is established and a retrenchment is justified in any particular case would depend on the factual matrix and circumstances of each case. It is not doubted that a retrenchment of workers would have psychological impact on the affected workers, more so if the worker has been in service for a long time in the organisation. He will likely face difficulty in relocating and/or securing other employment due to various factors. Hence, it is appropriate that certain viable and practicable guidelines are developed for the employer to adhere to in order to minimize the impact of retrenchment exercise on the workers. It is an established rule that an employer should ensure that retrenchment, if necessary, is carried out in a fair manner. It includes manner of selecting the worker or workers declared to be redundant, giving a fair opportunity to them to make representations on the possibility of re-deployment, etc. The courts would not normally interfere with a bona fide exercise of rights of an employer in a retrenchment exercise, which rights are inherent in it. However, any form of victimisation of the employee, whether by arbitrary, perverse, baseless action or otherwise by the employer which is considered to be unnecessarily harsh or was not just or fair, or other mala fide action on the part of the employer, may warrant the courts’ interference. In light of the above, this paper will discuss retrenchment and its psychological impact on workers with particular focus on formulating some guidelines for employers with a view of minimising the impact. International Organization Center of Academic Research 2018 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/7/66980%20MINIMIZING%20PSYCHOLOGICAL%20IMPACT.pdf Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali and Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib and Ahmad, Muhamad Hassan and Kasi, Arun (2018) Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer. In: 4th International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences, 15th-17th October 2018, Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.ocerints.org/adved18_e-publication/papers/141.pdf |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Local University |
institution |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Repository |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
topic |
KPG Malaysia |
spellingShingle |
KPG Malaysia Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ahmad, Muhamad Hassan Kasi, Arun Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
description |
The competing interests of a worker and an employer require that a worker’s security of tenure must be
balanced against the just expectation of the employer for latitude, under genuine redundancy in the
organisation, to retrench the surplus labour or workers. Such redundancy may arise due, among others, to a
reduction of business activities, perceived advantages of greater mechanisation and technological change,
deployment of capital resources in different ways, reorganisation of business operations with a view to
enhancing profitability, and reducing losses either generally or in selected areas. For a retrenchment to be
justified, there must be convincing grounds to establish redundancy. Whether a genuine redundancy is
established and a retrenchment is justified in any particular case would depend on the factual matrix and
circumstances of each case. It is not doubted that a retrenchment of workers would have psychological
impact on the affected workers, more so if the worker has been in service for a long time in the organisation.
He will likely face difficulty in relocating and/or securing other employment due to various factors. Hence, it
is appropriate that certain viable and practicable guidelines are developed for the employer to adhere to in
order to minimize the impact of retrenchment exercise on the workers.
It is an established rule that an employer should ensure that retrenchment, if necessary, is carried out in a
fair manner. It includes manner of selecting the worker or workers declared to be redundant, giving a fair
opportunity to them to make representations on the possibility of re-deployment, etc. The courts would not
normally interfere with a bona fide exercise of rights of an employer in a retrenchment exercise, which rights
are inherent in it. However, any form of victimisation of the employee, whether by arbitrary, perverse,
baseless action or otherwise by the employer which is considered to be unnecessarily harsh or was not just
or fair, or other mala fide action on the part of the employer, may warrant the courts’ interference. In light of
the above, this paper will discuss retrenchment and its psychological impact on workers with particular focus
on formulating some guidelines for employers with a view of minimising the impact. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ahmad, Muhamad Hassan Kasi, Arun |
author_facet |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ahmad, Muhamad Hassan Kasi, Arun |
author_sort |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
title |
Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
title_short |
Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
title_full |
Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
title_fullStr |
Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
title_sort |
minimizing psychological impact on workers in genuine redundancy: formulating guidelines for employer |
publisher |
International Organization Center of Academic Research |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/66980/7/66980%20MINIMIZING%20PSYCHOLOGICAL%20IMPACT.pdf |
first_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:35:06Z |
last_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:35:06Z |
_version_ |
1777412767865634816 |