A comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
The tyranny of the majority against the rights of the minority is warded off by constitutional safeguards enforced primarily by the court. This is one of the reasons why Malaysia and Indonesia adopt the doctrine of constitutional supremacy when they achieved independence in 1957 and in 1945 respecti...
Main Authors: | Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, Satriawan, Iwan, Muhammad, Nur Islami |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
Universiti Putra Malaysia
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/1/JSSH%28S%29-0538-2017%20%28ACCEPTANCE%20LETTER%29%2017.8.2018%20%281%29.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/9/62225_A%20Comparison%20of%20Constitutional%20Adjudication_article.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62225/15/62225_A%20comparison%20of%20constitutional%20adjudication%20institutions%20in%20Malaysia%20and%20Indonesia_scopus.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Constitutional democracy and constitutional adjudication: a comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Judicial activism and judicial restraint in the constitutional adjudication institution of Malaysia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin
Published: (2019) -
Strengthening constitutional democracy through constitutional adjudication institutions: a comparative study between Indonesia and Australia
by: Satriawan, Iwan, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The diversity of constitutional adjudication and the universality of constitutional justice: common issues and challenges
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The role of religion in interpreting the Malaysian constitution
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin
Published: (2017)