Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي

Linguistic argumentation, according to Arab grammarians means a formulation of grammatical rules from the primary sources, which are; Anomaly, consensus, measurement, the argumentation which bases on circumstances and others. The anomaly sources are considered the most authentic references which are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
Format:	Article
Language:	English English
Published:	Brill, Netherlands 2016
Subjects:	B Philosophy (General) B108 Ancient BC Logic P Philology. Linguistics PA Classical philology PJ Semitic PJ6073 Language PJ6690 Ancient Arabic PJ7501 Arabic literature
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/1/JQHS%20Yaacob-published.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/8/53498_Counter%20argumentation_scopus.pdf

id	iium-53498
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-534982017-01-11T02:16:33Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/ Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah B Philosophy (General) B108 Ancient BC Logic P Philology. Linguistics PA Classical philology PJ Semitic PJ6073 Language PJ6690 Ancient Arabic PJ7501 Arabic literature Linguistic argumentation, according to Arab grammarians means a formulation of grammatical rules from the primary sources, which are; Anomaly, consensus, measurement, the argumentation which bases on circumstances and others. The anomaly sources are considered the most authentic references which are Quran, Hadith an-Nabawi and Arabic poetry. The research aims to highlight the differing views of some Arab grammarians in devising the grammatical rules of the hadith. The Quran has no need to debate on its authenticity due to the reliable reading of all verses consisted. However the questions raise; what is the difference between reliable reading and anomalous reading? Why grammatical rules which derived from anomalous reading were accepted? And why the linguistic argumentation which resulted from Hadith an-Nabawi was refuted? And why it was accepted in unknown poetry? And why the argumentation from Quran and Arab poetry are not enough as evidences in linguistic argumentation? These questions will be answered thoroughly by presenting the evidences and arguments from the scholars. An analytical study will develop the method approach of the topic discussion. Brill, Netherlands 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/1/JQHS%20Yaacob-published.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/8/53498_Counter%20argumentation_scopus.pdf Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah (2016) Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي. Al-BayĀn – Journal of QurʾĀn and ḤadĪth Studies, 14 (2). pp. 223-245. ISSN 2232-1950 E-ISSN 2232-1969 http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/22321969/14/2
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
topic	B Philosophy (General) B108 Ancient BC Logic P Philology. Linguistics PA Classical philology PJ Semitic PJ6073 Language PJ6690 Ancient Arabic PJ7501 Arabic literature
spellingShingle	B Philosophy (General) B108 Ancient BC Logic P Philology. Linguistics PA Classical philology PJ Semitic PJ6073 Language PJ6690 Ancient Arabic PJ7501 Arabic literature Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
description	Linguistic argumentation, according to Arab grammarians means a formulation of grammatical rules from the primary sources, which are; Anomaly, consensus, measurement, the argumentation which bases on circumstances and others. The anomaly sources are considered the most authentic references which are Quran, Hadith an-Nabawi and Arabic poetry. The research aims to highlight the differing views of some Arab grammarians in devising the grammatical rules of the hadith. The Quran has no need to debate on its authenticity due to the reliable reading of all verses consisted. However the questions raise; what is the difference between reliable reading and anomalous reading? Why grammatical rules which derived from anomalous reading were accepted? And why the linguistic argumentation which resulted from Hadith an-Nabawi was refuted? And why it was accepted in unknown poetry? And why the argumentation from Quran and Arab poetry are not enough as evidences in linguistic argumentation? These questions will be answered thoroughly by presenting the evidences and arguments from the scholars. An analytical study will develop the method approach of the topic discussion.
format	Article
author	Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
author_facet	Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
author_sort	Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
title	Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
title_short	Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
title_full	Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
title_fullStr	Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
title_full_unstemmed	Counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
title_sort	counter argumentation against the theory of discrediting hadith as linguistic evidence while accepting the authenticity of anomalous qira ʾat and unknown poetry أوهام نظرية رفض الاحتجاج بالأحاديث النبوية الصحيحة بقبول القراءات الشاذة والشعر المجهول في الاحتجاج اللغوي
publisher	Brill, Netherlands
publishDate	2016
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/1/JQHS%20Yaacob-published.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/53498/8/53498_Counter%20argumentation_scopus.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:15:40Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:15:40Z
_version_	1777411545512280064

Similar Items