Constitutional democracy and constitutional adjudication: a comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
The experience of some countries show that parliamentary sovereignty creates problems of hegemony of majority which has the potential to ignore minority. One of democratic responses to the evil of the majority is the emergence of the concept of constitutional democracy. The tyranny of majority ag...
Main Authors: | Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, Satriawan, Iwan, Islami, Muhammad Nur |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/52707/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52707/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52707/3/Constitutional%20Democracy%20and%20Constitutional%20Adjudication.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/52707/15/ICLAS%202016.pdf |
Similar Items
-
A comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Strengthening constitutional democracy through constitutional adjudication institutions: a comparative study between Indonesia and Australia
by: Satriawan, Iwan, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Judicial activism and judicial restraint in the constitutional adjudication institution of Malaysia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin
Published: (2019) -
The diversity of constitutional adjudication and the universality of constitutional justice: common issues and challenges
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The role of the constitutional court in consolidating democracy in Indonesia: An evaluation after ten years
by: Satriawan, Iwan, et al.
Published: (2015)