Indecent assault and criminal justice system: a comparative apparaisal

Is it legally correct to say that indecent assault means an assault, which has in it an element of indecency? According to Ralph Gibson in the celebrated case of R. v. Court (1987) 84 Cr. App. R. 210, (CA), indecent assault means an assault accompanied by circumstances of indecency on the part of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: IIUM 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/50584/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50584/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/50584/1/50584.pdf
Description
Summary:Is it legally correct to say that indecent assault means an assault, which has in it an element of indecency? According to Ralph Gibson in the celebrated case of R. v. Court (1987) 84 Cr. App. R. 210, (CA), indecent assault means an assault accompanied by circumstances of indecency on the part of the defendant towards the complainant, and „indecent‟ has been defined as overtly sexual. What has the prosecution got to prove to establish the defendant‟s guilt on this charge of indecent assault? It is said that they must prove two things. Firstly, that the defendant‟s conduct was such that it would appear to an ordinary observer as an affront to modesty: conduct, which contravenes right-thinking people‟s ideas of standards of decent behaviour. Secondly, that the defendant had an indecent intention in doing what he did. So, first indecent assault must represent conduct that would appear to the ordinary observer as an affront to modesty and secondly it must have an indecent intention (motive) on the part of the defendant in doing what he did. However, in Malaysia, under section 354 of the Malaysian Penal Code, the term “assault or use of criminal force to a person with intent to outrage modesty” is used instead of “indecent assault”. The question is, does the above legal requirements, which were laid down in R. v. Court need to be fulfilled as the essential ingredients under section 354 of the Malaysian Penal Code?