Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires

AIM: The Damon system recommends the use of revolutionary, high-technology Damon edgewise wires [0.019 0.025 inch stainless steel (SS)] for major mechanics and finishing. No study has been carried out to compare this relatively new Damon SS archwire to other popular SS archwires. The aim of this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abu Bakar, Noraini, McDonald, Fraser, Sheriff, Martyn, Tan, Lawrence
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/1/49992.pdf
id iium-49992
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-499922016-04-25T02:59:59Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/ Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires Abu Bakar, Noraini McDonald, Fraser Sheriff, Martyn Tan, Lawrence RK Dentistry AIM: The Damon system recommends the use of revolutionary, high-technology Damon edgewise wires [0.019 0.025 inch stainless steel (SS)] for major mechanics and finishing. No study has been carried out to compare this relatively new Damon SS archwire to other popular SS archwires. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of Damon 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires with Standard Ormco and 3M 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thirty preformed archwires of each type (Standard Ormco, 3M and Damon) were tested in the as-received condition. Tensile tests were performed on an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Data were obtained for maximum load, 0.1 per cent yield strength and Automatic/Young’s modulus. RESULTS: For maximum load, there was no difference between Damon (mean: 659.8 ± 26.6 N) and 3M (mean: 668.4 ± 9.1 N) archwires, but both were statistically superior to Standard Ormco (mean: 611.9 ± 23.2 N). With respect to automatic modulus, Damon (mean: 41786.0 ± 5104.2 MPa) was statistically inferior to both Standard Ormco (mean: 47318.2 ± 6106.2 MPa) and 3M (mean: 49897.6 ± 3286.1 MPa) wires. For the 0.1 per cent yield strength, there was no difference between Damon (mean: 2150.1 ± 88.6 MPa) and 3M (mean: 2178.8 ± 29.6 MPa), but both were statistically superior to the Standard Ormco archwires (mean: 1990.8 ± 74.5 MPa). With regard to the Young’s modulus, Damon (mean: 40598.3 ± 5077.4 MPa) was statistically inferior to both Standard Ormco (mean: 44910.9 ± 5463.4 MPa) and 3M (mean: 47500.7 ± 3431.6 MPa). CONCLUSION Damon 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires were shown to be similar to 3M in maximum load and 0.1 per cent yield strength. As for Young’s and Automatic Modulus, Damon was statistically inferior to 3M and Standard Ormco. 3M was superior in all parameters. Oxford University Press 2013-09 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/1/49992.pdf Abu Bakar, Noraini and McDonald, Fraser and Sheriff, Martyn and Tan, Lawrence (2013) Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires. In: Abstracts of Lecturers and Scientific Posters, 26-29 June 2013, Iceland.
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic RK Dentistry
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Abu Bakar, Noraini
McDonald, Fraser
Sheriff, Martyn
Tan, Lawrence
Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
description AIM: The Damon system recommends the use of revolutionary, high-technology Damon edgewise wires [0.019 0.025 inch stainless steel (SS)] for major mechanics and finishing. No study has been carried out to compare this relatively new Damon SS archwire to other popular SS archwires. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of Damon 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires with Standard Ormco and 3M 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires.MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thirty preformed archwires of each type (Standard Ormco, 3M and Damon) were tested in the as-received condition. Tensile tests were performed on an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Data were obtained for maximum load, 0.1 per cent yield strength and Automatic/Young’s modulus. RESULTS: For maximum load, there was no difference between Damon (mean: 659.8 ± 26.6 N) and 3M (mean: 668.4 ± 9.1 N) archwires, but both were statistically superior to Standard Ormco (mean: 611.9 ± 23.2 N). With respect to automatic modulus, Damon (mean: 41786.0 ± 5104.2 MPa) was statistically inferior to both Standard Ormco (mean: 47318.2 ± 6106.2 MPa) and 3M (mean: 49897.6 ± 3286.1 MPa) wires. For the 0.1 per cent yield strength, there was no difference between Damon (mean: 2150.1 ± 88.6 MPa) and 3M (mean: 2178.8 ± 29.6 MPa), but both were statistically superior to the Standard Ormco archwires (mean: 1990.8 ± 74.5 MPa). With regard to the Young’s modulus, Damon (mean: 40598.3 ± 5077.4 MPa) was statistically inferior to both Standard Ormco (mean: 44910.9 ± 5463.4 MPa) and 3M (mean: 47500.7 ± 3431.6 MPa). CONCLUSION Damon 0.019 0.025 inch SS archwires were shown to be similar to 3M in maximum load and 0.1 per cent yield strength. As for Young’s and Automatic Modulus, Damon was statistically inferior to 3M and Standard Ormco. 3M was superior in all parameters.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Abu Bakar, Noraini
McDonald, Fraser
Sheriff, Martyn
Tan, Lawrence
author_facet Abu Bakar, Noraini
McDonald, Fraser
Sheriff, Martyn
Tan, Lawrence
author_sort Abu Bakar, Noraini
title Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
title_short Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
title_full Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
title_fullStr Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
title_sort comparison of mechanical properties between different stainless steel archwires
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2013
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49992/1/49992.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:10:38Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:10:38Z
_version_ 1777411229218766848