A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models

Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faris, Waleed Fekry, Ihsan, Sany Izan, Ahmadian, Mehdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inderscience Publishers 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/1/A_comparative_ride_performance_and_dynamic.pdf
id iium-49838
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-498382016-07-18T00:31:52Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/ A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models Faris, Waleed Fekry Ihsan, Sany Izan Ahmadian, Mehdi T351 Mechanical drawing. Engineering graphics TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TJ181 Mechanical movements TJ210.2 Mechanical devices and figures. Automata. Ingenious mechanism. Robots (General) Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle analysts owing to their shorter computational time and lower cost compared with continuous models. In this paper, ride comfort, suspension displacement and road-holding performances are compared for three different models – quarter (Q), half (H) and full (F) car models. In each model, semi-active system controls, namely skyhook, groundhook and hybrid controls, are used along with the conventional passive system. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. Results show that while the responses give generally the same trend, the simpler model gives significantly higher responses. Inderscience Publishers 2009 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/1/A_comparative_ride_performance_and_dynamic.pdf Faris, Waleed Fekry and Ihsan, Sany Izan and Ahmadian, Mehdi (2009) A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration, 5 (1/2). pp. 116-140. ISSN 1479-1471 E-ISSN 1479-148X http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJVNV.2009.029195 doi:10.1504/IJVNV.2009.029195
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic T351 Mechanical drawing. Engineering graphics
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ181 Mechanical movements
TJ210.2 Mechanical devices and figures. Automata. Ingenious mechanism. Robots (General)
spellingShingle T351 Mechanical drawing. Engineering graphics
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ181 Mechanical movements
TJ210.2 Mechanical devices and figures. Automata. Ingenious mechanism. Robots (General)
Faris, Waleed Fekry
Ihsan, Sany Izan
Ahmadian, Mehdi
A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
description Vehicle models used to evaluate performance and dynamic behaviour are either discrete models, which includes quarter, half, and full car models, or continuous models using finite element modelling. In this work our focus will be on discrete models, which have more popularity with ground vehicle analysts owing to their shorter computational time and lower cost compared with continuous models. In this paper, ride comfort, suspension displacement and road-holding performances are compared for three different models – quarter (Q), half (H) and full (F) car models. In each model, semi-active system controls, namely skyhook, groundhook and hybrid controls, are used along with the conventional passive system. The analysis covers both transient and steady-state responses in the time domain and transmissibility response in the frequency domain. Results show that while the responses give generally the same trend, the simpler model gives significantly higher responses.
format Article
author Faris, Waleed Fekry
Ihsan, Sany Izan
Ahmadian, Mehdi
author_facet Faris, Waleed Fekry
Ihsan, Sany Izan
Ahmadian, Mehdi
author_sort Faris, Waleed Fekry
title A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
title_short A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
title_full A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
title_fullStr A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
title_full_unstemmed A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
title_sort comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semi-active suspension systems based on different vehicle models
publisher Inderscience Publishers
publishDate 2009
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/49838/1/A_comparative_ride_performance_and_dynamic.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:10:25Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:10:25Z
_version_ 1777411214675017728