On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method

Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a powerful group decision making tool. Many kinds of people – social science researchers, academicians, heads of business organizations, social activists have been using NGT to make decisions in group setting. Basically, NGT is a brainstorming method that generates a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Islam, Rafikul
Format:	Conference or Workshop Item
Language:	English English English
Published:	2015
Subjects:	HF5001 Business. Business Administration
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/1/NGT_Rafikul.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/2/AGBA_certificate.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/4/AGBA_at_Kuantan.pdf

id	iium-47698
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-476982018-06-20T02:35:30Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/ On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method Islam, Rafikul HF5001 Business. Business Administration Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a powerful group decision making tool. Many kinds of people – social science researchers, academicians, heads of business organizations, social activists have been using NGT to make decisions in group setting. Basically, NGT is a brainstorming method that generates a large number of ideas pertaining to a certain issue and also prioritizes those ideas through a voting scheme. Outcome of a nominal group (NG) session is a prioritized list of ideas. Normally, six to ten people participate in a NG session and they make the prioritized list together as a group through the aforementioned voting scheme. The present research is proposed to investigate the difference, if any, between the outcomes obtained from a nominal group session and a subsequent follow-up survey. Two experiments have been conducted in quick succession in order to compare the results of NGT study and the subsequent survey. It has been observed that, for both the experiments, the ranking of the ideas obtained in NGT and survey method is significantly close as supported by the associated rank correlation test. The findings of the present research reinforce the usefulness of NGT in terms of generating ideas and the reliability of the ranking that it generates. 2015-11-16 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/1/NGT_Rafikul.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/2/AGBA_certificate.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/4/AGBA_at_Kuantan.pdf Islam, Rafikul (2015) On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method. In: 12th AGBA Annual World Congress 2015, 16th-17th Nov., 2015, Gambang, Pahang. (Unpublished) http://www.agba.us/latest-conference.html
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English English
topic	HF5001 Business. Business Administration
spellingShingle	HF5001 Business. Business Administration Islam, Rafikul On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
description	Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a powerful group decision making tool. Many kinds of people – social science researchers, academicians, heads of business organizations, social activists have been using NGT to make decisions in group setting. Basically, NGT is a brainstorming method that generates a large number of ideas pertaining to a certain issue and also prioritizes those ideas through a voting scheme. Outcome of a nominal group (NG) session is a prioritized list of ideas. Normally, six to ten people participate in a NG session and they make the prioritized list together as a group through the aforementioned voting scheme. The present research is proposed to investigate the difference, if any, between the outcomes obtained from a nominal group session and a subsequent follow-up survey. Two experiments have been conducted in quick succession in order to compare the results of NGT study and the subsequent survey. It has been observed that, for both the experiments, the ranking of the ideas obtained in NGT and survey method is significantly close as supported by the associated rank correlation test. The findings of the present research reinforce the usefulness of NGT in terms of generating ideas and the reliability of the ranking that it generates.
format	Conference or Workshop Item
author	Islam, Rafikul
author_facet	Islam, Rafikul
author_sort	Islam, Rafikul
title	On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
title_short	On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
title_full	On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
title_fullStr	On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
title_full_unstemmed	On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
title_sort	on investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method
publishDate	2015
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/1/NGT_Rafikul.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/2/AGBA_certificate.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47698/4/AGBA_at_Kuantan.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:07:50Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:07:50Z
_version_	1777411052786417664

On investigating the difference between outcomes obtained from nominal group technique and survey method

Similar Items