The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions

Using interview as one of the selection methods for recruitment, organizations not only aim to select the best candidates for the job but also want to attract them to work in their organizations. This suggests applicants‟ reactions to job interview do matter. Objective: This study sought to examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahadi, Masyitah, Alias, Alizi, Ismail, Isma Suhaila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: INSI Publications 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/1/Mahadi%2C_Alias_and_Ismail_2015.pdf
id iium-45650
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-456502017-11-30T12:19:29Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/ The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions Mahadi, Masyitah Alias, Alizi Ismail, Isma Suhaila HF5548.7 Industrial psychology HF5549 Personnel management Using interview as one of the selection methods for recruitment, organizations not only aim to select the best candidates for the job but also want to attract them to work in their organizations. This suggests applicants‟ reactions to job interview do matter. Objective: This study sought to examine applicant reactions to different types of structured interview content by comparing between Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI). Method: Forty six job incumbents, as samples, were given transcripts of interview content for SI and PBDI which were counterbalanced in the order of their presentation. After completing them, the participants were asked to answer a short questionnaire on applicant reactions to the two types of structured interview content. Results: The results demonstrated a significant effect of structured interview content on applicants‟ fairness or procedural justice perception, with the mean for PBDI is significantly greater than the mean for SI. Conclusion: The findings showed that using interview transcript, job incumbents reacted more positively to PBDI than SI, which indicated that participants regarded PBDI to have a higher perceived procedural justice or perceived fairness than SI. These findings have contributed better understanding to the contradicting findings in earlier empirical researches INSI Publications 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/1/Mahadi%2C_Alias_and_Ismail_2015.pdf Mahadi, Masyitah and Alias, Alizi and Ismail, Isma Suhaila (2015) The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9 (28(sp)). pp. 219-224. ISSN 1991-8178 http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2015/Special%20IPN%20HCM%20Aug/219-224.pdf
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic HF5548.7 Industrial psychology
HF5549 Personnel management
spellingShingle HF5548.7 Industrial psychology
HF5549 Personnel management
Mahadi, Masyitah
Alias, Alizi
Ismail, Isma Suhaila
The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
description Using interview as one of the selection methods for recruitment, organizations not only aim to select the best candidates for the job but also want to attract them to work in their organizations. This suggests applicants‟ reactions to job interview do matter. Objective: This study sought to examine applicant reactions to different types of structured interview content by comparing between Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI). Method: Forty six job incumbents, as samples, were given transcripts of interview content for SI and PBDI which were counterbalanced in the order of their presentation. After completing them, the participants were asked to answer a short questionnaire on applicant reactions to the two types of structured interview content. Results: The results demonstrated a significant effect of structured interview content on applicants‟ fairness or procedural justice perception, with the mean for PBDI is significantly greater than the mean for SI. Conclusion: The findings showed that using interview transcript, job incumbents reacted more positively to PBDI than SI, which indicated that participants regarded PBDI to have a higher perceived procedural justice or perceived fairness than SI. These findings have contributed better understanding to the contradicting findings in earlier empirical researches
format Article
author Mahadi, Masyitah
Alias, Alizi
Ismail, Isma Suhaila
author_facet Mahadi, Masyitah
Alias, Alizi
Ismail, Isma Suhaila
author_sort Mahadi, Masyitah
title The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
title_short The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
title_full The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
title_fullStr The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
title_full_unstemmed The effects of Situational Interview (SI) and Patterned Behavior Description Interview (PBDI) on applicant reactions
title_sort effects of situational interview (si) and patterned behavior description interview (pbdi) on applicant reactions
publisher INSI Publications
publishDate 2015
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/45650/1/Mahadi%2C_Alias_and_Ismail_2015.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:04:57Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:04:57Z
_version_ 1777410870734749696