Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine

In this study, the impact responses for GFRP type C-600 and GFRP type E-800 have been investigated. Impact tests were performed using a drop weight tester, IMATEK IM10T with eight different levels of energy ranging from 6 J to 48 J. The variation of impact characteristics such as peak displacemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Safri, S. N. A., Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq, Aminanda, Yulfian
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Switzerland 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/1/impact_characterisation_of_glass_fibre_reinforced_polymer_%28GFRP%29_type_carbon_C-600_and_E-800_using_drop_weight_machine.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/4/38449_Impact%20characterisation%20of%20Glass%20Fibre.SCOPUSpdf.pdf
id iium-38449
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-384492017-09-18T08:10:28Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/ Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine Safri, S. N. A. Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq Aminanda, Yulfian TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery In this study, the impact responses for GFRP type C-600 and GFRP type E-800 have been investigated. Impact tests were performed using a drop weight tester, IMATEK IM10T with eight different levels of energy ranging from 6 J to 48 J. The variation of impact characteristics such as peak displacement, peak force and energy absorbed versus impact energy and damaged area were investigated. From the experimental studies, it can be concluded that for each type of GFRP, the impact energy showed excellent correlation with the impact characterization and the damaged area. The difference in the thickness and mechanical properties for both types of GFRP do affect the impact characterization and the damaged area of the specimens tested. It can be concluded that GFRP type E-800 is higher in strength compared to GFRP type C-600. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Switzerland 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/1/impact_characterisation_of_glass_fibre_reinforced_polymer_%28GFRP%29_type_carbon_C-600_and_E-800_using_drop_weight_machine.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/4/38449_Impact%20characterisation%20of%20Glass%20Fibre.SCOPUSpdf.pdf Safri, S. N. A. and Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq and Aminanda, Yulfian (2014) Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 629. pp. 461-466. ISSN 1660-9336 http://www.ttp.net/978-3-03835-232-7/8.html 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.629.461
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Safri, S. N. A.
Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq
Aminanda, Yulfian
Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
description In this study, the impact responses for GFRP type C-600 and GFRP type E-800 have been investigated. Impact tests were performed using a drop weight tester, IMATEK IM10T with eight different levels of energy ranging from 6 J to 48 J. The variation of impact characteristics such as peak displacement, peak force and energy absorbed versus impact energy and damaged area were investigated. From the experimental studies, it can be concluded that for each type of GFRP, the impact energy showed excellent correlation with the impact characterization and the damaged area. The difference in the thickness and mechanical properties for both types of GFRP do affect the impact characterization and the damaged area of the specimens tested. It can be concluded that GFRP type E-800 is higher in strength compared to GFRP type C-600.
format Article
author Safri, S. N. A.
Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq
Aminanda, Yulfian
author_facet Safri, S. N. A.
Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq
Aminanda, Yulfian
author_sort Safri, S. N. A.
title Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
title_short Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
title_full Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
title_fullStr Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
title_full_unstemmed Impact characterisation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) type C-600 and E-800 using a drop weight machine
title_sort impact characterisation of glass fibre reinforced polymer (gfrp) type c-600 and e-800 using a drop weight machine
publisher Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Switzerland
publishDate 2014
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/1/impact_characterisation_of_glass_fibre_reinforced_polymer_%28GFRP%29_type_carbon_C-600_and_E-800_using_drop_weight_machine.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38449/4/38449_Impact%20characterisation%20of%20Glass%20Fibre.SCOPUSpdf.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:55:15Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:55:15Z
_version_ 1777410260643872768