Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?

The present tort system has been criticised as not being a suitable mechanism for compensating victims of medical negligence. The deficiencies of the system has been identified and proven as not being able to fulfill objectives such as providing fair and adequate compensation, maintaining equity be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LexisNexis 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/1/mediating_medical_negligence.pdf
id iium-3396
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-33962011-12-28T04:28:41Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/ Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform? Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie K Law (General) The present tort system has been criticised as not being a suitable mechanism for compensating victims of medical negligence. The deficiencies of the system has been identified and proven as not being able to fulfill objectives such as providing fair and adequate compensation, maintaining equity between injured victims with similar needs, providing deterrence and incentives to accident reduction. Alternatives to the tort system have been advocated, particularly in employing various methods of alternative dispute resolution to reach a settlement between disputing parties. Such methods can be seen to do away with the rigours of litigation by offering settlement through a fairer, cheaper and more helpful approach. Compared to other methods of alternative dispute resolution, mediation seems to offer a costless process of integrative bargaining. It does not emphasize on who should win or lose, who is right or wrong. Rather, it focuses on goals of reconciliation and personal transformation. In mediation, parties participate directly in what is thought to be an informal and voluntary dispute resolution process that may offer a novel and promising approach in resolving claims. In handling medical negligence claims, mediation can be seen as the main form of dispute resolution, which provides speedy, economical and trauma-free alternative to litigation. Experiences from countries that have employed mediation for medical negligence disputes such as England and Australia can offer valuable lessons to Malaysia in assessing whether this alternative can be a viable option in solving the problems inherent in medical negligence litigation in Malaysia. LexisNexis 2008 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/1/mediating_medical_negligence.pdf Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie (2008) Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform? Malayan Law Journal, 4. cix-cxxvi. ISSN 0025-1283
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
description The present tort system has been criticised as not being a suitable mechanism for compensating victims of medical negligence. The deficiencies of the system has been identified and proven as not being able to fulfill objectives such as providing fair and adequate compensation, maintaining equity between injured victims with similar needs, providing deterrence and incentives to accident reduction. Alternatives to the tort system have been advocated, particularly in employing various methods of alternative dispute resolution to reach a settlement between disputing parties. Such methods can be seen to do away with the rigours of litigation by offering settlement through a fairer, cheaper and more helpful approach. Compared to other methods of alternative dispute resolution, mediation seems to offer a costless process of integrative bargaining. It does not emphasize on who should win or lose, who is right or wrong. Rather, it focuses on goals of reconciliation and personal transformation. In mediation, parties participate directly in what is thought to be an informal and voluntary dispute resolution process that may offer a novel and promising approach in resolving claims. In handling medical negligence claims, mediation can be seen as the main form of dispute resolution, which provides speedy, economical and trauma-free alternative to litigation. Experiences from countries that have employed mediation for medical negligence disputes such as England and Australia can offer valuable lessons to Malaysia in assessing whether this alternative can be a viable option in solving the problems inherent in medical negligence litigation in Malaysia.
format Article
author Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
author_facet Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
author_sort Jahn Kassim, Puteri Nemie
title Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
title_short Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
title_full Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
title_fullStr Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
title_full_unstemmed Mediating medical negligence claims in Malaysia: an option for reform?
title_sort mediating medical negligence claims in malaysia: an option for reform?
publisher LexisNexis
publishDate 2008
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3396/1/mediating_medical_negligence.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:11:13Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:11:13Z
_version_ 1777407490494824448