The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density

Objective: To investigate whether premenopausal hysterectomy has an effect on bone mass in women in their fifties . Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 25 healthy women who had premenopausal hysterectomy before the age of 45 and at least 2 years before the study with 40 healthy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulwahab, Dalia F, Reyad, B, Chabek, M, Awang, Mokhtar, Abd. Wahab, Noraziana, Muna, Q
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/1/The_influence_of_premenopausal.pdf
id iium-29266
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-292662014-07-16T05:57:49Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/ The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density Abdulwahab, Dalia F Reyad, B Chabek, M Awang, Mokhtar Abd. Wahab, Noraziana Muna, Q R Medicine (General) Objective: To investigate whether premenopausal hysterectomy has an effect on bone mass in women in their fifties . Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 25 healthy women who had premenopausal hysterectomy before the age of 45 and at least 2 years before the study with 40 healthy natural postmenopausal women 45–60 years old. Evaluation of the menopausal state was done by measuring serum follicular stimulating hormone and serum estradiol. Bone mineral density of the left proximal femur was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in six regions (femoral neck, greater trochanter, interochantric, ward‘s triangle, shaft, total hip region). Evaluation of bone remodeling done by measuring serum alkaline phosphotase. The result of both groups were compared. Results: The study showed slight increment of BMD among cases with hysterectomy than the control group by an amount ranging between 1.9% in the femoral shaft to 4.8% in the greater trochanter and ward‘s triangle. These differences were not statistically significant and even when they were exceptionally significant as the case with BMD of the femoral neck and intertrochantric area they were too small in magnitude to be of clinical relevance. Conclusion: Hysterectomy had no impact on bone parameters even after adjusting for the duration of menopause. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2012-06-04 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/1/The_influence_of_premenopausal.pdf Abdulwahab, Dalia F and Reyad, B and Chabek, M and Awang, Mokhtar and Abd. Wahab, Noraziana and Muna, Q (2012) The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119 (Oct.). p. 225. ISSN ISSN: 1471-0528 (O), 1470-0328 (P) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03382.x/pdf 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03382.x
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Abdulwahab, Dalia F
Reyad, B
Chabek, M
Awang, Mokhtar
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
Muna, Q
The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
description Objective: To investigate whether premenopausal hysterectomy has an effect on bone mass in women in their fifties . Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 25 healthy women who had premenopausal hysterectomy before the age of 45 and at least 2 years before the study with 40 healthy natural postmenopausal women 45–60 years old. Evaluation of the menopausal state was done by measuring serum follicular stimulating hormone and serum estradiol. Bone mineral density of the left proximal femur was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in six regions (femoral neck, greater trochanter, interochantric, ward‘s triangle, shaft, total hip region). Evaluation of bone remodeling done by measuring serum alkaline phosphotase. The result of both groups were compared. Results: The study showed slight increment of BMD among cases with hysterectomy than the control group by an amount ranging between 1.9% in the femoral shaft to 4.8% in the greater trochanter and ward‘s triangle. These differences were not statistically significant and even when they were exceptionally significant as the case with BMD of the femoral neck and intertrochantric area they were too small in magnitude to be of clinical relevance. Conclusion: Hysterectomy had no impact on bone parameters even after adjusting for the duration of menopause.
format Article
author Abdulwahab, Dalia F
Reyad, B
Chabek, M
Awang, Mokhtar
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
Muna, Q
author_facet Abdulwahab, Dalia F
Reyad, B
Chabek, M
Awang, Mokhtar
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
Muna, Q
author_sort Abdulwahab, Dalia F
title The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
title_short The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
title_full The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
title_fullStr The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
title_full_unstemmed The influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
title_sort influence of premenopausal hystrectomy on bone mineral density
publisher Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
publishDate 2012
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29266/1/The_influence_of_premenopausal.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:42:56Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:42:56Z
_version_ 1777409486361722880