Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence

Forensic evidence has emerge as one of the important tools to connect an accused to the crime for which he is charged and to identify him in case he is of mysterious identity. Its role is also crucial in affirming material facts relevant to issues contested before a court in civil suit. It has bec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/1/Forensic_Evidence.pdf
id iium-22688
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-226882017-03-07T06:48:50Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/ Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh Forensic evidence has emerge as one of the important tools to connect an accused to the crime for which he is charged and to identify him in case he is of mysterious identity. Its role is also crucial in affirming material facts relevant to issues contested before a court in civil suit. It has become indispensable in the process of implementing justice in the Western legal systems. In the Islamic jurisdictions, on the other hand, although its use and admissibility has been attempted – its evidential weight continues to invoke juristic discourses and legal theorization. It is often classified as a kind of qarinah whose admissibility as a mode of proof has invoked the same polemics that surrounds qarinah itself. This essay, however, argues: first, forensic evidence ipso facto represents an expert opinion from forensic scientists. It is as such derives its legitimacy from the Islamic sources as a separate method of proof. Second, it as a means of proof is another sure way of establishing the truth (al-bayyinah) – distinct from qarinah. It, in terms of standard and evidential weight, amounts to oral testimony perceived and revealed through scientific eyes as it unlike qarinah not only gives rise to suspicion and conjecture but affirmatively proves and disproves facts and relevant facts. Lastly, in terms of function it not only tracks and traces the physical evidence against the accused in a criminal trial, it also discloses other issues of psycho anthropological relevance to all types of cases. Accordingly, a thoughtful reflection about the reality of forensic evidence, as argued above would broaden our horizon of thinking about the ways that legal justice could obtain today. 2010 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/1/Forensic_Evidence.pdf Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah (2010) Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence. In: IIUM Research, Innovation & Invention Exhibition (IRIIE 2010), 26 - 27 January 2010, Kuala Lumpur.
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh
spellingShingle KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh
Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
description Forensic evidence has emerge as one of the important tools to connect an accused to the crime for which he is charged and to identify him in case he is of mysterious identity. Its role is also crucial in affirming material facts relevant to issues contested before a court in civil suit. It has become indispensable in the process of implementing justice in the Western legal systems. In the Islamic jurisdictions, on the other hand, although its use and admissibility has been attempted – its evidential weight continues to invoke juristic discourses and legal theorization. It is often classified as a kind of qarinah whose admissibility as a mode of proof has invoked the same polemics that surrounds qarinah itself. This essay, however, argues: first, forensic evidence ipso facto represents an expert opinion from forensic scientists. It is as such derives its legitimacy from the Islamic sources as a separate method of proof. Second, it as a means of proof is another sure way of establishing the truth (al-bayyinah) – distinct from qarinah. It, in terms of standard and evidential weight, amounts to oral testimony perceived and revealed through scientific eyes as it unlike qarinah not only gives rise to suspicion and conjecture but affirmatively proves and disproves facts and relevant facts. Lastly, in terms of function it not only tracks and traces the physical evidence against the accused in a criminal trial, it also discloses other issues of psycho anthropological relevance to all types of cases. Accordingly, a thoughtful reflection about the reality of forensic evidence, as argued above would broaden our horizon of thinking about the ways that legal justice could obtain today.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
author_facet Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
author_sort Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
title Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
title_short Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
title_full Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
title_fullStr Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed Forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in Islamic Jurisprudence
title_sort forensic evidence: a rethinking about its use and evidential weight in islamic jurisprudence
publishDate 2010
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/22688/1/Forensic_Evidence.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:34:32Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:34:32Z
_version_ 1777408957454745600