3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission

The need for an engine that offers a low fuel consumption and good low-end torque grown for the past few years. The European environment protection agencies have drawn d<J the emission limits annually with emerging countries has started to adopt the European legislation. OEMs world wide have str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Mohiuddin, A. K. M., Mohd Sood, Anwar
Format:	Book Chapter
Language:	English
Published:	IIUM Press 2011
Subjects:	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL1 Motor vehicles
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/1/Chapter_14.pdf

id	iium-19645
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-196452012-08-01T08:18:44Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/ 3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission Mohiuddin, A. K. M. Mohd Sood, Anwar TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL1 Motor vehicles The need for an engine that offers a low fuel consumption and good low-end torque grown for the past few years. The European environment protection agencies have drawn d<J the emission limits annually with emerging countries has started to adopt the European legislation. OEMs world wide have strived to meet the stringent regulation that made them develop smaller engine capacity with high low-end torque. Furthermore, continuously increas price of the fuel requires improving the engine efficiency. Electronic controlled Multi-Port Fuel Injection (MPFI) systems instead of fuel system with carburettor have been used since 1980 Development of small vehicle segments has started to look for alternatives to meet the consumption challenge. Therefore, adoption of gasoline direct injection (GOi) fuel systems new small engines hopefully can reduce hydrocarbon emissions by having fuelling and controls separated. Both 3-cylinder and 4-cylinder base engine configurations will be ex}: for the same engine capacity of 1.2 L. Improvements in hydrocarbon emissions, heat losses scavenging will be compared bet\veen the engmes. Plus, factors of packaging and considerations will also be look upon. IIUM Press 2011 Book Chapter PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/1/Chapter_14.pdf Mohiuddin, A. K. M. and Mohd Sood, Anwar (2011) 3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission. In: Engine and Auxiliary Systems. IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 86-91. ISBN 978-967-418-216-8 http://rms.research.iium.edu.my/bookstore/default.aspx
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL1 Motor vehicles
spellingShingle	TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL1 Motor vehicles Mohiuddin, A. K. M. Mohd Sood, Anwar 3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
description	The need for an engine that offers a low fuel consumption and good low-end torque grown for the past few years. The European environment protection agencies have drawn d<J the emission limits annually with emerging countries has started to adopt the European legislation. OEMs world wide have strived to meet the stringent regulation that made them develop smaller engine capacity with high low-end torque. Furthermore, continuously increas price of the fuel requires improving the engine efficiency. Electronic controlled Multi-Port Fuel Injection (MPFI) systems instead of fuel system with carburettor have been used since 1980 Development of small vehicle segments has started to look for alternatives to meet the consumption challenge. Therefore, adoption of gasoline direct injection (GOi) fuel systems new small engines hopefully can reduce hydrocarbon emissions by having fuelling and controls separated. Both 3-cylinder and 4-cylinder base engine configurations will be ex}: for the same engine capacity of 1.2 L. Improvements in hydrocarbon emissions, heat losses scavenging will be compared bet\veen the engmes. Plus, factors of packaging and considerations will also be look upon.
format	Book Chapter
author	Mohiuddin, A. K. M. Mohd Sood, Anwar
author_facet	Mohiuddin, A. K. M. Mohd Sood, Anwar
author_sort	Mohiuddin, A. K. M.
title	3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
title_short	3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
title_full	3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
title_fullStr	3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
title_full_unstemmed	3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission
title_sort	3-cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and nox emission
publisher	IIUM Press
publishDate	2011
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/19645/1/Chapter_14.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T20:29:21Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T20:29:21Z
_version_	1777408631015211008

3-Cylinder gasoline direct injection as opposed to 4-cylinder multi-port fuel injection for lower fuel consumption and NOX emission

Similar Items