Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis

To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan, Tekasakul, Putthawan, Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi, Sirimai, Korakot, Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/1/Laparoscopic_hysterectomy_versus_abdominal_hysterectomy_for_severe_pelvic_endometriosis.pdf
id iium-11543
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-115432012-01-13T03:37:37Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/ Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan Tekasakul, Putthawan Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi Sirimai, Korakot Abd. Wahab, Noraziana RG Gynecology and obstetrics To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes—including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion—were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1±48.7 minutes and 139.9±52.4 minutes, respectively; Pb0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6±255.1 mL versus 760.9±633.2 mL [Pb0.001]; 3.5±1.1 days versus 6.4±3.0 days [Pb0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [Pb0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy. Elsevier BV 2012-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/1/Laparoscopic_hysterectomy_versus_abdominal_hysterectomy_for_severe_pelvic_endometriosis.pdf Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan and Tekasakul, Putthawan and Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi and Sirimai, Korakot and Abd. Wahab, Noraziana (2012) Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 116 (2). pp. 109-111. ISSN 0020-7292 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002072921100556X 10.1016/j.ijog.2011.09.022
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic RG Gynecology and obstetrics
spellingShingle RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan
Tekasakul, Putthawan
Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi
Sirimai, Korakot
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
description To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes—including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion—were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1±48.7 minutes and 139.9±52.4 minutes, respectively; Pb0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6±255.1 mL versus 760.9±633.2 mL [Pb0.001]; 3.5±1.1 days versus 6.4±3.0 days [Pb0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [Pb0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy.
format Article
author Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan
Tekasakul, Putthawan
Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi
Sirimai, Korakot
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
author_facet Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan
Tekasakul, Putthawan
Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi
Sirimai, Korakot
Abd. Wahab, Noraziana
author_sort Chalermchockchareonkit, Amphan
title Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
title_short Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
title_full Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
title_sort laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
publisher Elsevier BV
publishDate 2012
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11543/1/Laparoscopic_hysterectomy_versus_abdominal_hysterectomy_for_severe_pelvic_endometriosis.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:20:51Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:20:51Z
_version_ 1777408096394543104